The big difference between TheClimateChanger's data (which is cool to see), and mine, is the scope of the area. He has a small area in the S sub, while I have a much larger one. Using maps from MRCC's map maker, you can see the reason for some of the differences that show up just because of the wx pattern differences that affect our region. That, and the difference in agencies handling of raw data (which these maps are using with a 1991-2020 baseline)) with their respective modelling/reanalysis techniques they employ (which is why I avg them using 1901-2000 baseline). Unfortunately, MRCC only goes back to 1900, so no 1868 map is available. I also added the lat/long lines on the 1st map to show the area that I'm using. Other than 1868, the other hot years on my chart are virtually tied. An update on a dataset could change those with such a tiny margin. Since 1955, and 2020 are on his top 5, I included those as well. Hope this helps those perusing our posts.
1868: 3.461
2012: 2.814
1901: 2.714
1936: 2.614
1921: 2.613
1955: 2.428
2020: 1.806