Off topic, but I kinda figured it was coming. In civil engineering field, we're slowly transitioning to 3D using drone imagery, etc.. I use a product called Pix4D.
Someday (if not already) computer models will show the fluid dynamics in a 3D giving amateurs like me a better understanding of what's actually going on.
Nearly every model seems to have that trailing 700mb vort off the Georgia coast tugging it out to sea and preventing the surface low from really winding up near the benchmark. I somehow find that hard to believe for a bombing low in that vicinity, or is this not that unusual?
I might head up to Cannon tomorrow morning. I "think" (hoping) it's going to be snow above 2500'. I've been sitting at 29 ski days for almost a month. I've never reached 30! NAM trended colder.
Heading up north to do some spring cleanup. Also hoping to see some snow mix in at higher elevations. I'm thinking there's a decent possibility some snow may accumulate above about 2500'. Thoughts?
The RPM model (I think) that all the met's have been using cornholes us. Personally, I'd rather see it come northwest for the mountains, but I'll take an easterly solution that pushes the subsidence east and jackpots the Merrimack Valley