ORH_wxman

The snowpack around ORH after that storm was near 2 feet and high water content as there was a lot of sleet in a previous storm a few days before the 1/20/78 storm. If the Cleveland superbomb hasn’t knocked the pack down about a foot or more, the blizzard of ‘78 would have been even more disastrous for snow removal issues.

Tomorrow is the real WINDEX look but mostly south of you.

Someone's gonna grab at least that much I think....wouldn't surprise me if a few lucky peeps got 2-3".

Oh its the original Lundstedt paper. Just search his name and "wintertime instability index" and I'm sure you'll find it. But from what I remember, you want 1. T1 RH above 50% (preferably above 75%) 2. T1-T5 layer lapse rate of more than 10C (more than 14C was huge signal for squalls provided other parameters were good) 3. LI spike of more than 8 in a 12h period Some other "factors" to consider, but they tie into the above....big PVA (usually associated with the LI spike) and TTs over 50 (associated with very steep lase rates)

I remember that one...late March 2013. I think it may have been 3/21-22. Tomorrow isn't really a norlun per say...it's not stationary long enough, but it's more of a WINDEX look for a good chunk of the region south of the pike. It looks best closer to the south coast but can't rule out some decent squalls as far north as pike region. Your area may get something if lucky.

Total Totals in the low 60s tomorrow....that is really impressive. I definitely wouldn't be shocked to see someone get lucky down south with a couple inches. Max DGZ is around 800mb too, so that is going to help too. There's actually a lot of WINDEX parameters satisfied in this...big time TTs, huge LI spike, LL moisture, good PVA, etc.

PV lobe is pretty far west this run on 1/26....lets get that involved and make it more interesting. Doesn't do it on this run, but that's not far off. Get it a bit southwest and that give us more upside in the 1/26 storm than there was previously. Also this is a D7 prog so take it FWIW....I know I shouldn't have to mention this, but we have some short-tempered whiners recently with the boring weather

Here's the high temps for ORH....the only day that remotel sniffed 50F was the 47F high in the warm sector briefly on Saturday thi past weekend. Otherwise......total snoozefest way to run a torch month.

I feel the exact opposite actually....the temp gradient between NNE and SNE has been very low....hence the +9 to +10 anomalies up north and the +6 to +7 anomalies in ORH and BOS. We've lacked good baroclinicity most of the month. Thought he last 2 or 3 days that hasn't been the case as there was a frontal boundary that cooled off NNE while we were still torching a bit down here.

1956 was a pretty good Feb, esp north of pike....but not blockbuster. Obviously March was a blockbuster.

Yeah it’s still mind blowing to me too. There was easily over 100” in that same period just south or south-southwest of BOS.

They must have gotten some kind of waiver. Check out “west ridge road” up on Stratton. The entire thing is above 2500 feet with some spots above 2600.

Yeah I think we need to investigate the man-made snow contamination aspect of the W.E maps. I’ve been looking at several maps this evening from different dates and notice the peak itself really sticks out like a sore thumb....I know that any elevation is going to stick out but it seems pretty zonked.

They have them up around 2600 actually. I think they are more like million dollar houses, lol...but they are really high. I’ve looked before.

Yeah it def favors storms staying south of us...of course the irony being when we needed it most (Friday night and early Saturday), we couldn’t get it to squeeze south of us and keep us snow. Usually you’ll get a storm or two that will try to run up into that block and produce for us...instead we just got skunked a few different ways.

That’s interesting that Stratton might be similar or even better for W.E. I wonder if Stratton really rakes it in more in synoptic storms and then is only marginally worse in upslope? That would help explain the W.E. differences. One thing to keep a note in...Stratton has trails going around a good portion of the mountain so I wonder how much snow making contamination is in the NORHC maps? Something to consider too.

You would’ve thought we could score at least 1 or 2 half-decent events out of this. I’ll consider us fortunate that the NAO isn’t going away any time soon and we’ll get to take some more hacks at it with a better cold source.

Ahh ok makes sense...yeah that’s how ridiculous that winter was, lol...we already had smashed 30 day snowfall records just over 2 weeks into the blitz and another major storm was on the way.

What’s the reference point on those dates? They definitely aren’t the “max snow in a 30 day period” that winter because BOS had 90.2” between 1/24 and 2/15 which is just over 3 weeks.

Doesn’t look like we’re getting a +PNA again any time soon but a bit of Rockies ridging would help. Looks like that happens the last several days of the month which may help those threats a little more after the 1/26 one. The 1/26 threat itself is still on the table but the upside seems somewhat limited due to a lack of ridging in the Rockies. Not that most people here would even turn down an advisory event if offered, lol.

I’ve always wondered how much snow would be measured if someone was up in the Glastonbury wilderness NNW of Woodford in those 3000+ foot peaks. Like that would be an amazing spot for a ski resort. The terrain there looks insane for upslope. I feel like they’d easily get over 200” per year there but there is nobody there to measure it. Lol.

I’d take Feb 63 and Feb 64...’60 was meh (though I’d gladly take it if it meant a we get a 3/3/60 repeat) and Feb ‘87 was an absolute nightmare.

Looks a lot like late January ‘69/early Feb ‘69. We got abused for like 3 weeks before the Lindsay Storm finally happened even though the pattern never really changed that much. I feel like one of those late month threats will pan out but maybe we just get tortured for another week or two.

Weeklies went wild with the -AO/NAO well into February. If that is correct, we’re either in for more torture or a lot of fun. Can’t punt with that look. (Well I guess you can but it’s like punting on 4th and 2 at your opponent 40 down by 7 with 4 min to go)