Jump to content

baltosquid

Members
  • Posts

    531
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by baltosquid

  1. If we’re dropping complaints, I’ll say that sometimes it grates to hear over and over again “not a typical storm for us, we don’t usually score this way” in the wake of a bad run… we have been on a historic streak of misses, and that includes missing low prob hit after low prob hit. I know no one is omitting the larger context on purpose; the ones who know what’s a good look or not are also the sort that probably are good at keeping focus on one storm. But it does feel like it’s speaking to a different angst (getting upset over missing one bad opportunity) than the actual angst (getting upset over having mostly bad opportunities for years and also missing all of them). Like, would I be wrong to say it’s odd (need not say the double C words) that most/more storm opportunities are razor’s edge now, atypical, or just in general may require a fluke to get through, and we simultaneously get Lucy’d on all of them (particularly the metros)? I feel like a part of building a climate year is occasionally hitting a storm you’d expect not to hit individually.

     

    It leaves a couple questions. First is the obvious “can it snow” and I am in the yes camp… but next is “can we do slam dunks?” And “can we do flukes?” 


    To the former, we don’t seem to be getting those opportunities to test that. To the latter, sure as hell not recently. If we can’t do what we’d view as a fluke anymore then is it time to move the goalposts on what a fluke is? Are slam dunks and their supporting patterns actually just flukes now? It’s probably not that bad but it feels that way from Baltimore…
     

     

    • Thanks 1
  2. 1 minute ago, Chris78 said:

    I pulled this from the PA thread but I would say the OP doesn't agree with its ensembles .  Pleasantly surprised to see this.

    IMG_4025.thumb.png.a9b6de92c690500885e0a715d3d4a735.png.c33393054d9211f3eac7534a3f4cb4c2.png

    A nice silver lining, just have to hope there's still room for the ensembles to be the leader here rather than the OP. Relatively close now...

  3. I95 seems no longer IN the goalposts but rather is itself one of the posts… needle thin path to a mostly snow event may remain in the realm of reason. But if the incoming euro is bad and the runs through 00z don’t start a trend back to the good, might be exiting that realm of reason. Might be taking down the tree after all…

    • Weenie 2
  4. Just now, Snowmadness said:

    Still learning here and not experienced like many but over the past three GFS runs the trough has been shifting eastward

    d0478d81-8054-40ed-8d44-46f2afbcfc1e.thumb.gif.5d24b328a0e48d12e25a53f81d2771c9.gif
    But conversely, the TPV (minus anomalies in Canada) is getting its fingers deeper and deeper into the cookie jar with each run, and the low in the north Atlantic is moving away. Trace clockwise circles around the red and counter-clockwise around the blue... our storm is right in the middle of two features that want to send it on a 0-degree heading.

    • Like 1
  5. Zero accumulation in Canton, outside of a dusting on garbage bins. Nothing really falling right now. Don't think anything will come of this unless a good heavy band comes in with whatever manages to fill in, but that would probably only leave the area with a dusting. Batting .000 with anafrontal systems this winter... and most winters. At least some of the heavier sideways stuff has been nice to watch.

    • Like 1
  6. 22 minutes ago, North Balti Zen said:

    that comports with my obs from Balt City. Balt City hasn't had verifiable warning criteria snow since the January 2016 event (unless 1/3 got there this year, but I wasn't living in the city then. Downtown definitely did not verify warning level on 1/3). 

    It did not get there in Canton, was around 3-4 inches. Areas further south still within the city borders potentially could have eked it out but I don't think the gradient was steep enough. Same deal for the end of week storm.

    • Thanks 1
  7. 54 minutes ago, Maestrobjwa said:

    Wait are you sure? If memory serves we got about 3 inches from that event...but I'll go back and check.

    ONE YEAR AGO: The "Spring Snowstorm of 2018" (wmar2news.com) The more I'm researching it the more conflicting info I see. Some places report warning criteria, others not. Guess it varied backyard to backyard. My backyard probably didn't actually break warning criteria based on these totals, though other parts of the city did. Which would mean I haven't seen a warning snowfall since moving to Baltimore a month before that storm, and Baltimore hasn't gotten a flush verified warning criteria snowfall since 2016 I think.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...