Jump to content

SnowDreamer

Members
  • Posts

    436
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by SnowDreamer

  1. 2 minutes ago, Wentzadelphia said:

    Hmm, idk what to think. Almost looks like it missed the 12z euro phase with that energy up near the lakes. That’s a good sign that you guys are killing it even without that happening. Hard for me to know for sure though. The phase impacts Philly and SNE more anyway you guys can do well with this one even without that happening. 

    The 12Z OP has started phasing with that bit of energy by then and 18Z Control hasn't, but I think the control is just a little slower judging from the ULL and the SLP position. I think it might still get to about the same place. Something to watch for in the 00Z run. 

  2. Just now, Interstate said:

    Just because one model shows an historical storm doesn’t mean they should elevate it risk any higher. What happens tonight if it disappears. The general population uses these graphics and you cannot have wild swings on them based on one model run.  

    I totally agree that you can't have wild model swings in a forecast based on 1 run, but the graphic clearly states *potential* impact. The GEM, GFS, PARA all show ~6" for D.C. and the EURO is back-to-back 12"+. I personally wouldn't classify that potential as low, and I don't think I'm alone in that. 

  3. Just now, Bubbler86 said:

    There was indeed a fairly strong pushback from people on the forecasts...forecasts which ended up being underdone for most.  I was told by one client that it never snows 30" in Virginia. 

    I believe it! I just meant that the models didn't offer much alternative to the forecast. No real choice on which "camp" to pick. Obviously I'm not going to say it'll snow 24" when the storm is 5 days away, but every day we got closer and the big runs just kept coming. This is opposed to most of our storms where we wait for a camp to cave.

    • Like 1
  4. 1 minute ago, Steve25 said:

    I've checked a few different radar sources that are showing snow in places it's definitely not snowing. Not completely understanding why that is though

    Whatever method the site uses to determine precip types is incomplete. Probably uses surface temp obs and upper air data that's not fine enough to detect the "warm layer"

    • Like 1
  5. 5 minutes ago, GEOS5ftw said:

    On the dual-pol radar correlation coefficient, there is indication of melting at around 3000 ft (eyeballing the 3.1 degree scan). Something to watch if this disappears as the heavier precip moves in.

    I've never heard of this technique... Are you using trig and distance from the dish to estimate here? 

×
×
  • Create New...