Jump to content

jaydreb

Members
  • Posts

    2,045
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by jaydreb

  1. 6 minutes ago, WinterWxLuvr said:

    Split that inner circle and you’re good. Typically we rely upon ensembles up until about this time. For some reason we are super fixated on the ops this time.

    I guess because all the ops have been unrelentingly consistent with the track.  

  2. Just now, nj2va said:

    Didn’t high risk post earlier this week that the GFS OP and ensembles are basically run off two different parameters?  GFS OP was upgraded but GEFS wasn’t?  

    He did.  But I think he also said that at that range the GEFS would be more accurate than an op.  Not sure whether that is still the case at this range.  

  3. 1 minute ago, Steve25 said:

    Is this technically what the model is saying the "end result" will be though? Or is this just the total snowfall from before the changeover, then you use your imagination to figure out how much of it gets wiped away by rain? 

    Total snowfall.  It doesn’t tell you what will actually be on the ground when all is said and done. There is also a “Snow Depth” map but I usually find it to be overly pessimistic.  

    • Like 1
  4. Accuracy will be higher at shorter time leads, so the fact that GFS at 72-84 seems to be an improvement over where it was at 12z is encouraging.  What happens when the storm gets to 100+ hours is still within the envelope of uncertainty.  

×
×
  • Create New...