tunafish

I wasn't even talking about his theory, I just think he is a gigantic turd. But now that we're talking about it... am I supposed to believe that all those observers conspired together to inflate their totals, via selective drift measurements, and that almost all of them reporting damn close to double what dipstick is saying? And the other guy in here thinks it's people were trying make the storm live up to the hype after the 'rug pull', just so they dont feel like they missed out on a generational storm? Wut? Do I think those measurements are 100% accurate, definitely not, but I'm talking within 15-25% of reality. You could convince me of the higher end, but not broadly. But dozens of people reporting 100% more than "what really fell" is ridiculous to me. Also highly doubt the NWS tried earnestly to convince him he had a higher total. Impressive display of narcissistic personality disorder, really. I think this is a guy who has a history of overreaction when it comes to jackpots and him missing out. He was having epic meltdowns leading up to this event. I dont think he can handle missing the earlier event this season and the jack on this. If I can't have it nobody can'd.

Between this story and that YouTube above, this guy is total dink. There's a way to commit to the bit and make it funny. He's just sort of an asshole. And (likely) wrong in his assertions. A truly terrible combination.

I (so badly) want this to be a troll job by him, but based on the evidence (read: his posts here), my conclusion is that he is, most certainly, NOT.

What a tremendous narcissist OP is. Wow.

So this is saying ASOS recorded 0.58" precip, and the observer - at the same location as the ASOS, or not - recorded 35.5" new (and a depth of 21). I'm assuming all NWS major climate-site observers capture SWE - why not use that? How effective is ASOS at capturing preicp totals from snow, especially in wind like that? Like what were the 35.5" obs SWE??

That 6.5" for South Portland is a mile up the road. Must've had about .20" more QPF than me . 4.8"/0.43"

Idk, drugs are pretty great in moderation. 05z - final PWM - 4.8"/0.45" - depth 13"

Been getting good rates and growth. Tough to say until I measure at 18z but I would estimate 2-3" so far. Been steady moderate to heavy snow since 12z.

Getting smoked here. Relative to what was expected, at least.

You really should check out Darfford this time of year.

How, on the eve of a HECS, does one possibly find themselves so downtrodden they are reduced to looking at D11 2m temp maps? Look... I'm here, too, losering it up, so I can say that. 12°F

This one?

You forgot to include their logo.

-Slightly on the lower side of climo snowfall for PWM, but season-to-date is still considered AVG. -Relatively persistent cold ---2 weeks in Jan AN but not a torch and no f*kn cutters. -Plenty of days with sun and little or no wind. Oh boo hoo it was only 12°. shhhh. -P-sure Xmas was white, too.

Snowy week on the euro. LFG.