LibertyBell

theres still hope for late March and early April

omg this is amazing its sticking to everything including the roads and visibilities are super low because it's blowing around too and coming down pretty hard

it just shows that climatewise Brooklyn and Queens are more like Nassau County than they are like Manhattan and after all both LGA and JFK are in Queens and they are much closer to my snowfall totals than they are to Manhattan's

it's fairly light here after an initial brief burst

There was a decent difference in snowfall totals between Manhattan and Brooklyn, Ed. Brooklyn received a 6"+ and 12"+ event and Manhattan did not.

Yes and if anyone was around then they would also have cursed living on the south shore since the glacier never made it down here

really? and here I figured that geographically they are all part of the same geographical structure. where I live in Nassau County it's pretty urban trust me, we get hotter than NYC does on a west or northwest wind

snow has commenced here!

this is why Brooklyn and Queens should be lumped together with Long Island (they are part of Long Island after all) and NYC should only refer to Manhattan.

it's getting dark

how much did we get on 12-11-93? I'm guessing not much since I only remember the late December snow event that year. We only had two all snow events in 93-94, the first event in late December and the final event in late March. Both were around 4" each

https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2022/03/russia-economic-sanctions-wheat-oil/627004/?utm_source=pocket-newtab 1) The Green-Energy Revolution Goes Into Warp Speed Tech revolutions in the 21st century tend to be very fast. It took about a decade for the share of Americans with a smartphone to go from zero to 80 percent. But energy revolutions are lazier affairs, and the green-energy transition in particular has been torpid in the U.S. and Europe, which is perhaps surprising given the declining price of solar energy. The West has simply refused to build green-energy projects fast enough to decarbonize the grid. Russia’s war could accelerate the green revolution in two big ways. First, it will increase political pressure on the U.S. and European governments to reduce reliance on Russian oil and gas. (The U.S. has already said it will stop importing Russian energy, and Europe is considering a similar ban.) In the short term, countries will lean harder on spare oil and gas sources to keep prices down. But over time, the boycott of Russian energy could raise the price of thermal energy enough that it compels countries to deploy significantly more wind and solar projects. For years, anti-growth fears, antinuclear sentiment, and vague NIMBYism have stood in the way of green-energy construction. The urgency of an external threat could melt away some of those anxieties. “We can not talk about renewables revolution if getting a permit to build a wind park takes seven years,” said Kadri Simson, the European commissioner for energy. “It is time to treat these projects as being in the overriding public interest, because they are.” Second, rising energy prices will change consumer preferences, nudging more consumers away from gas-powered cars. Today less than 5 percent of the U.S. car market is fully electric. But the industry is pushing electric vehicles hard; nearly every automotive ad in the Super Bowl was for an EV. This marketing shift could combine with a painful spike in gas prices in a way that gets more Americans to buy EVs, which will encourage more automotive companies to invest in EV production, which could bring down the cost of EVs, which will increase demand. This possible shift from energy pain to energy progress has a historical precedent. In 1973, OPEC cut off the U.S. and other countries from access to its oil, raising gas prices. Although most Americans associate that period with economic stagnation, the crisis also led American car manufacturers to become more energy efficient. Actual fuel economy as measured in miles per gallon took off in 1973. Fifty years later, we could see the same dynamic play out: the shock of energy pain leading to decades of progress.

https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2022/03/russia-economic-sanctions-wheat-oil/627004/?utm_source=pocket-newtab 1) The Green-Energy Revolution Goes Into Warp Speed Tech revolutions in the 21st century tend to be very fast. It took about a decade for the share of Americans with a smartphone to go from zero to 80 percent. But energy revolutions are lazier affairs, and the green-energy transition in particular has been torpid in the U.S. and Europe, which is perhaps surprising given the declining price of solar energy. The West has simply refused to build green-energy projects fast enough to decarbonize the grid. Russia’s war could accelerate the green revolution in two big ways. First, it will increase political pressure on the U.S. and European governments to reduce reliance on Russian oil and gas. (The U.S. has already said it will stop importing Russian energy, and Europe is considering a similar ban.) In the short term, countries will lean harder on spare oil and gas sources to keep prices down. But over time, the boycott of Russian energy could raise the price of thermal energy enough that it compels countries to deploy significantly more wind and solar projects. For years, anti-growth fears, antinuclear sentiment, and vague NIMBYism have stood in the way of green-energy construction. The urgency of an external threat could melt away some of those anxieties. “We can not talk about renewables revolution if getting a permit to build a wind park takes seven years,” said Kadri Simson, the European commissioner for energy. “It is time to treat these projects as being in the overriding public interest, because they are.” Second, rising energy prices will change consumer preferences, nudging more consumers away from gas-powered cars. Today less than 5 percent of the U.S. car market is fully electric. But the industry is pushing electric vehicles hard; nearly every automotive ad in the Super Bowl was for an EV. This marketing shift could combine with a painful spike in gas prices in a way that gets more Americans to buy EVs, which will encourage more automotive companies to invest in EV production, which could bring down the cost of EVs, which will increase demand. This possible shift from energy pain to energy progress has a historical precedent. In 1973, OPEC cut off the U.S. and other countries from access to its oil, raising gas prices. Although most Americans associate that period with economic stagnation, the crisis also led American car manufacturers to become more energy efficient. Actual fuel economy as measured in miles per gallon took off in 1973. Fifty years later, we could see the same dynamic play out: the shock of energy pain leading to decades of progress.

Don I'm going to put an article in banter that you might be interested in, feel free to check it out.

okay but none yet for NYC or JFK? Hopefully this line coming through will change that.

yep that's what I figured. It's very rare when they don't weaken.

all forecasts busted so no measurable snowfall in NYC or any of the airports, Don, so far anyway?

I'd say about 50% of that will hold together for us, let's wait and see.

yeah as in garbage cans banging around outside

meh, I don't see why that wouldn't also dry up over the mountains before it gets here.

isn't that for the DC/BWI area though? How will that make it up here?

perchance? that's not a word you normally use lol

we are east of him but it sucks to live in the concrete jungle of Manhattan we have 26 inches on the season here, right at normal.

whats prolonged? do you mean it lasts an hour?

with all the complaining this isn't all that bad, visibility is reduced with the snow falling pretty decently.