NeonPeon
-
Posts
910 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Blogs
Forums
American Weather
Media Demo
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by NeonPeon
-
Shoot for the stars. If you fail, you'll still... post frothing rage, righteously indignant at the injustice of it all! I forgot how the phrase goes. I've been thinking 9 inches in my back yard for days. That'd be top 5 in my time here. I know that wouldn't raise an eyebrow elsewhere. Any more is gravy. I know plenty of guidance shows more. Once bitten, twice shy.
-
The drifts are going to be epic.
-
Fully agreed there. It's the hours before 9am I've never really cared for.
-
I've got young kids and I'm irrationally angry that someone is intentionally living a lifestyle that I'm forced into against my will.
-
I posted the same yesterday. I'm expecting Juno like results here, with some transient good stuff on the way in and out but during the height of it, subsidence. Good, but not great... Which might be as good as it gets here, bar a wonkier setup. Classic setups, traditional results.
-
To be fair it was impossible to measure that storm very accurately with the wind. The drifting was nuts.
-
I'm expecting something like 2015 here. This kind of screw look Imby, with wider general spread. I want the kid to see a proper snowstorm. He will see bits of one of the best. That's the best you're going to do down here.
-
It's not just in the nam. Honestly I've never seen a nor'easter not give me less than everywhere else due to banding on the ri/ct border and the core action north and east. It's kindof just the look. Newport is for gold digging second wives in the summer and subsidence in the winter.
-
The banding features are there in every storm. First I track whether the storm is actually coming. Once there is consensus on that I turn to the question of how it's going to screw me. This one is going to screw me in a fairly unoriginal way, it looks like. But, it's so enormous I'll still end up with plowable.
-
Gee I wonder where it will end up. I just can't imagine.
-
I always thought part of this effect was also ocean enhanced snow in a typical noreaster always enhancing rates to the north and east, then subsiding into the bay. Feel free to dispel this hackish bullshittery.
-
No one is ever arsed to show it in detail. People who live around the bay can apply the normal modifier. So many banding signatures show what always happens, better stuff northeast and better stuff west. In a very big storm, it gets enough goods around anyway. Im very dubious on a foot or more here, but that's the official forecast.
-
Lol, look at the antibullseye. Accurate
-
If it was juno redux, I would welcome it. Even though we got a relative min as usual, it was impossible to know precisely what we got anyway, there was so much drifring. There were drifts over the fences and bare grass. I skiied to a friend's 2 miles away and brought Glenlivet with me. It was a simpler time.
-
It's civil partnership. Europeans don't get married. What is this, 1950…?
-
I think you are misunderstanding. Anyhow. Yes. Many of these depictions are a blizzard in a few coastal places. Some could be a blizzard with some coastal flooding.
-
You are describing a james-shaped hole here constituting about a hundred mentions of the wind and the word blizzard. Rip.
-
Gfs ticked west... The chief outlier at this point. Hopefully we can get that into some sort of consensus today, so that a 0-2 feet forecast isn't floating around in the ether for half of new England.
-
When has a ri screw hole ever been centered over the rocky mountains of RI. When we get the mesos, the hole will start to resolve and then you can pick the best solution from whoever shows the correct relative min for me.
-
How do you know it's not reasonable. It seems plausible.
-
196 pages and things are getting toxic. My prediction? Pain.
-
Going from 14" verbatim to 1" has to be one of the biggest swings I've ever seen. Hilarious.
