Jump to content

EastonSN+

Members
  • Posts

    7,917
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by EastonSN+

  1. Right I get that if it were 19 degrees like the blizzard of 96 it would have accumulated quicker. However, what I am saying here is if everyone else gets say 6 inches, yet CPK gets 2.9, an under 3 inch record is misleading. The fact that CPK only got 2.9 has nothing to do with temps when all other areas with same or higher temps received more. The under 3 inch record would be very misleading.
  2. Lol we need someone on this forum to go over to CPK and measure/provide snow rates.
  3. I understand however I have to disagree to an extent. When all areas around are getting heavier banding it's bad luck. 33 is plenty cold enough. If the banding was a little east or west CPK would easily have 6 inches with this storm. This is where records can be misleading. I would agree if CPK was 35 or all of LI had no snow.
  4. It's truly shocking how even when everything lines up with temps/track somehow CPK misses out. At least it's NOT A TEMPS ISSUE.
  5. Temps were colder than expected, unfortunately the heaviest banding so far was east of CPK otherwise CPK would likely be at 4.
  6. Thanks. Channel 4 about an hour ago said the heaviest will be from 9 to 11 for NYC.
  7. Will the heavier banks make it back to CPK? Heaviest seems easy.
  8. Think 1993 as well.
  9. Looks like we have till the 24th or so, not bad.
  10. I hope they measure more often at CPK. It looked like it was over two inches on TWC.
  11. Would be interesting to see how much CPK helps in snow accumulation. It really looked like over two inches on TV.
×
×
  • Create New...