Jump to content

EastonSN+

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    9,095

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by EastonSN+

  1. EastonSN+
    So if anyone knows, what exactly is the below? I do not see a true -NAO but rather a large east coast ridge facilitated by a deep RNA. To me this is NOT a scary "SE ridge linking up to a negative NAO". I am sure this has happened MANY times in the past. Not sure how the rest of the winter shaped up in the past. A good deteriming factor of whether or not it is a true neg nao would be if it retrogrades to a neg AO or not.
  2. EastonSN+
    This is a disappointing front load if that's the case.
  3. EastonSN+
    I should have said IMBY which is SW CT. Central park also, which only received 1.4 inches of snow before turning to rain (this year they had a grossly undermeasured 2.9 inches AND a runaway HEI (they were 37 at the onset while the central Jersey coast had 34 lol)). To me it was the most disappointing BECAUSE it was historically cold and ended up with a rain storm in the middle of single digit temps before and after storm lol.
  4. EastonSN+
    Up here we ended up with above average snowfall and some snow from the "bust" so actually a decent year IMBY.
  5. EastonSN+
    IF IF it happened that way, at least this December was better snowfall wise than 1989 lol. That year had a heartbreaking snow to rain storm in the middle of one of the coldest Decembers in history. 1989/1990 was probably the most disappointing in my lifetime.
  6. EastonSN+
    Especially if the RNA is closer to the west coast and -2 or less. Would not happen in a +PNA.
  7. EastonSN+
    Such a small dataset. 1961/1962 was the only dud. All three years embedded in the 2 epic snowfall periods (1955 to 1969 and 2000 to 2018).
  8. EastonSN+
    3 good and 3 bad winters snowfall wise. Nice even split.
  9. EastonSN+
    It holds no meaning at this point lol.
  10. EastonSN+
    Exactly its now a useless measurement site.
  11. EastonSN+
    100% I am not longer considering the 4 inch record as relevant.
  12. EastonSN+
    Not even worth tracking theor measurements anymore.
  13. EastonSN+
    Just hit 4.0 inches at Easton CT.
  14. EastonSN+
    Just hit 4.0 inches at Easton CT. Was a little too far north and east.
  15. EastonSN+
    1970 through 1999 I would have considered a large event.
  16. EastonSN+
    Interesting look on the ensembles for the holiday period. Big ridge just to the west with blocking to our north and normal temps. Not sure if this is a good overruning look or a shredder look.
  17. EastonSN+
    It goes to show that not all good periods produce. I know I have said this at nauseum however this was the norm from 1970 through 1999.
  18. EastonSN+
    Last night they were at 37 when north central jersey shore and long Island locations were 34. The HIE has gotten too warm.
  19. EastonSN+
    Can't use central park anymore IMO as a benchmark.
  20. EastonSN+
    100% unfortunately people (u know who) will use this as "the new norm" for our area lol.
  21. EastonSN+
    Agreed. I have finally made a decision to stop tracking the record and using central park as a historical benchmark. Now I have to find a replacement.
  22. EastonSN+
    Why? Its not worth tracking central park accumulations anymore. It no longer holds any relevance to historical data.
  23. EastonSN+
    Yeah at this point even the record we have been tracking is completely useless. I bet barges off the coast have more accumulation lol.
  24. EastonSN+
    I think at this point its useless to use the central park measurement a a representation of our area. Major issue from a historical perspective.
  25. EastonSN+
    What I hate is my whole life central park was the basic representative of the general area both recent and historical. However at this point it has no relevance for any of the tri state area. North South East or west.
×
×
  • Create New...