EastonSN+

TWC likes 1 to 3 for MBY, however NWS has less than and inch. Stat padder

Can't believe March may deliver yet again!! Since 2010 March has out - performed December IMBY big time. Obviously this storm may be too far west for us, and tomorrow may be white rain if the rates are not good enough, however the fact that we are yet again in the game shows that you can almost never count out March (unless your in a torch like 2012).

This one looks like it's going to be agonizingly close for us, however end up west of us (Snowfall).

10 inches in Easton. However, tree fell on my house and my area lost power for 3 days. 28 inches total from March 1 to April 8.

Great storm down to the coast. Had 9.0 in Norwalk CT.

Damn i was hoping for March snow. The ensembles looked good to me around the 14th but I guess that's the way the cookie crumbles.

Damn. I am desperately trying to avoid my 7th below average snowfall year this century, but 11 inches to go and a so so pattern late winter early spring may not get it done.

The look is still present on the GEFS and GEPS. Let's see if it holds.

Don't get the Morch discussion. GEFS still has the below. Maybe EPS lost it? Thinking that CFS March temp anomaly is highly skewed by the first 11 days.

Borrowed from NE thread courtesy of ORH wxman

https://www.silive.com/news/2017/03/a_look_back_at_the_5_biggest_m.html

Correct and add 2019 to that list One 3.5 inch and one 8 inch storm in March.

I don't see how we do not get snow events with this look

I am still holding out hope to reach average, however will need 11. Ideally we get a biggie and torch, however more likely if I reach out will be from messy overrunning. Thought the ensembles looked good but I could be miss interpreting them.

Yeah 1983 was 16 and 2016 was 11.5 here.

You didn't get 20+ in February 2006? Here in SW CT only experienced 3 20 plus. 27 in 1996. 20.5 in 2006. 22 in 2013.

Thanks Don, given the depicted look of the ensembles I would not be shocked, but surprised if at least parts of the forum do not see more snow. ORH wxman in the NE forum had a great write up on the upcoming pattern in the March thread quoted below.... "The PNA index just measures where the height anomalies are within the PNA domain loading pattern. So because we have higher heights out toward the Aleutians and lower heights over western Canada, it’s going to produce a -PNA (RNA) number. It doesn’t mean the PV has to get sucked down into Washington and Oregon like it did back in December during that obscene pattern. The PV being over Hudson Bay will help with overrunning threats that might otherwise be cutters. You can see though how the mean trough is further east by the end of EPS run though. It’s more sitting over the central US instead of further west so it would give us a better shot at a Miller B. "

Do you find it odd that the RNA is that severely negative yet the polar vortex is still north of us and has not slide into the RNA? Is this depicted model spread or is this possible?

Not sure but had 16 when I was in Norwalk.

This may be nice?

Schools closed. Half inch of sleet.