Jump to content

EastonSN+

Members
  • Posts

    9,102
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by EastonSN+

  1. I think too much is put into these records. If CPK goes snowless this year people will read wayyyy too much into it (MJO/CC/la Nina/fast flow/extended jet) when in reality, it's one fluke different than 97/98. Or any other year where we had one event.
  2. Light snow Easton CT. Dusting
  3. I feel this is payback for all the great years we had this century!
  4. Just this one period. This endless warmth resembles the 90s outside of 93/94, 96/96 and 92/93 (also 01/02).
  5. This sums up the winter and the 80s. Frigid warm up quick and rain
  6. I don't have the actual stats but Don might.
  7. It came down to messing up a good setup in December. Ultimately, the northern stream low took over and became historically strong, which then stripped the 3rd low of moisture and suppressed it. That 3rd low had a TON of potential!! Had the 2nd storm been weaker we would not be talking about the record now. Take December 2000 for instance, one storm hit us and could easily have missed to the SE. We were bound to strike out at some point. In a typical la Nina, your window is early and sometimes late. Now we wait to see if we get to phase 8 in time.
  8. It can snow in any phase, it just a lot harder in 6.
  9. Courtesy of RTD. I like that they put together a write up.
  10. Was thinking about this. So far we've had three looks. The Neg NAO period, the PAC flood period and now we are heading into the look above. Kind of amazing CPK is at 0 with three different setups.
  11. MJO phase 6 by the 13th. Getting to 8 before the end of the season will likely be the determining factor as to whether or not we get at least 1 snow period this season (of course we could always get a fluke like Feb. 18, Jan 12, March 98 etc etc.).
  12. And after single digit lows. I remember we had a LOT of storms with perfect tracks which were all rain in 97/98.
  13. That right there was 97/98 in a nutshell.
  14. For all those not alive or too Young, this was 97/98.
  15. This will likely be the deciding factor in succeeding where winters like 72/73, 97/98 failed. Can we get to phase 8 at a decent amplitude in time....
  16. The only difference I see between 97/98 is 97/98 felt hopeless the entire winter. This winter we absolutely blew a golden opportunity. First storm too early for most (I only had 1.5). 2nd storm northern stream low absolutely exploded and became historically strong which is what ultimately did us in and avoided a December 2000 storm, the 3rd low which held a ton of potential was suppressed/moisture robbed from the historic 2nd storm. Now, as many we're saying la Ninas you have to score early as January and February are often hostile. We failed and now we are getting skunked. Sure we can score late Feb and March due to shorter wavelengths and all, but I would bet against at his point.
×
×
  • Create New...