Not to get into this again, because as I’ve said yesterday, I respect yours and anybody else’s effort who wants to do that type of thing. And it’s certainly appreciated.
But I think Frieks point, and thus mine too yesterday, is the fact of snowfall(that’s all). Snowfall cannot be forecasted at those long range leads. Sure, you can peg a pattern from a distance at times, but that does not always equate to a ferocious run of systems. Or a monstrous amount of snowfall for that forecasted pattern. Due to the obvious myriad of nuances that accompany each individual system.
And yes, sometimes it all falls into place and it’s awesome for everyone, and it turns out to be a great call for the guys who want to delve into that, and do the research and work. And congratulations is surely in order when that does occur.
I, and I’m sure anybody else here is CERTAINLY not shitting on you one bit, when we are talking about snowfall itself. So please don’t take any of that the wrong way. Because it’s not meant in any derogatory manner whatsoever. Your outlooks are fabulous. I know everybody appreciates them, and learns from them. As do I.