Jump to content

Random Chaos

Members
  • Posts

    751
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Random Chaos

  1. Quote

    BULLETIN - IMMEDIATE BROADCAST REQUESTED
    Severe Thunderstorm Warning
    National Weather Service Baltimore MD/Washington DC
    1043 PM EST Sun Jan 16 2022

    The National Weather Service in Sterling Virginia has issued a

    * Severe Thunderstorm Warning for...
      Southeastern Anne Arundel County in central Maryland...
      Northwestern Calvert County in southern Maryland...
      East central Prince Georges County in central Maryland...

    * Until 1130 PM EST.

    * At 1043 PM EST, severe thunderstorms were located along a line
      extending from near Deale to 6 miles east of Breezy Point to near
      Taylors Island, moving northeast at 40 mph.

      HAZARD...60 mph wind gusts.

      SOURCE...Radar indicated.

      IMPACT...Damaging winds will cause some trees and large branches 
               to fall. This could injure those outdoors, as well as 
               damage homes and vehicles. Roadways may become blocked by 
               downed trees. Localized power outages are possible. 
               Unsecured light objects may become projectiles.

    * Locations impacted include...
      Bowie, Annapolis, Mayo, Shady Side, Chesapeake Beach, Deale, Naval
      Academy, Upper Marlboro, Magothy River, Dobbins Island, Severn
      River, South River, Pinehurst, Gibson Island, Sillery Bay, Bodkin
      Point, Breezy Point, Rhode River, Severna Park and Arnold.

    PRECAUTIONARY/PREPAREDNESS ACTIONS...

    For your protection move to an interior room on the lowest floor of a
    building.

    Torrential rainfall is occurring with these storms, and may lead to
    flash flooding. Do not drive your vehicle through flooded roadways.

    &&

    LAT...LON 3895 7645 3873 7651 3861 7650 3882 7683
          3915 7642 3914 7641 3906 7642 3901 7637
    TIME...MOT...LOC 0343Z 218DEG 34KT 3879 7663 3865 7641 3855 7635 

    HAIL THREAT...RADAR INDICATED
    MAX HAIL SIZE...<.75 IN
    WIND THREAT...RADAR INDICATED
    MAX WIND GUST...60 MPH

    $$

    Here we go!

    • Like 1
    • Haha 4
  2. 1 hour ago, Volcanic Winter said:

    Tallis, I recognize you from Volcanocafe! Nice to see you here man. 
     

    And yes, this eruption did appear to be large enough to enact measurable climate forcings but we need more data on the overall volume and amount of SO2 injection. 
     

    Also, outside of very, very large eruptions (7+?), aren’t the climate forcings from large plinian eruptions usually restricted to the hemisphere they occurred in (aka Southern)? 

    Volcano Cafe is great! Always read it after an event, mostly lurker there but occasionally post. Got me to check my weather station for the shockwave:

     

    6DE2A690-E736-4D5F-88EF-090E430E7F8B.png

  3. 16 minutes ago, EastCoast NPZ said:

    Yes.  Wind would mix the surface inversion, scouring out the low level cold .  I don't buy any depiction showing a windy freezing rain scenario. 

    I’m not sure that’s quite what is depicted. The wind doesn’t really pick up on the NAM until after the rain transition on the model. That ZR is almost entirely before the big rain mass reaches us. If you look at the 850 winds at 0z Monday on the 12z NAM, the mass of wind has just reached DC and already the ZR has pulled north of DC.

    • Like 1
  4. Looks to me the biggest problem with the models is consolidating the low pressure in a single location. The GFS is jumping back and forth between 2 of these lows, and that seems to be what is making the sudden west jog jyst before it hits us:

     

    758125C5-904D-49C4-8331-923C614B41D5.png

    • Like 2
  5. I’m thinking of the storm a week ago. The GFS had it a week ahead, then lost it, only to get it back 2 days ahead, then stuck verbatim and we got a good storm. Next few days could be rough but lets not write this thing off from run to run oscillation. There’s definitely something going on with the op vs ensembles but no clue what. Remember thst data for this storm is originating out over the pacific now - mostly satellite derived data which is less accurate than ground stations.

  6. 12 minutes ago, DDweatherman said:

    I can't answer to the first part, but because of higher resolution, the permutations these models identify and go in depth on have a greater downstream influence sooner in the run because of their resolution. Obviously, if that happens based on a feature 60 hours into a run, the downstream impact on big picture evolution is further magnified versus a run at lower res. 

    That’s exactly what I was thinking, just wondering if there was a study on it. Not talking verification scores so much as how these permutations are amplified. The raw data ingested is not exact, especially data that originated west of California, and errors or inaccuracies in the data could be amplified in the 5+ day period for us on the east coast in higher resolution models.

  7. I wonder, have there been any studies on the accuracy of a model at medium to long range when run at different  resolutions? It seems to me that both the Euro and GFS were better at the 5+ day range (more consistent run-to-run) back before the resolution upgrades that started a number of years back. I’m bringing this up because the EPS and GEFS are run at lower resolution and both have eastern tracks vs the op. Wondering if errors are getting amplified at range with these higher resolution models.

    • Like 1
  8. I’ll take the COBB output!

    NAM 18z:

    220107/0700Z  13  35007KT  30.5F  SNOW    9:1| 0.1|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.009    9:1|  0.1|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.01  100|  0|  0
    220107/0800Z  14  32009KT  30.5F  SNOW   20:1| 2.4|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.120   19:1|  2.5|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.13  100|  0|  0
    220107/0900Z  15  32008KT  30.5F  SNOW   27:1| 1.8|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.066   22:1|  4.2|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.20  100|  0|  0
    220107/1000Z  16  32009KT  30.3F  SNOW   20:1| 0.8|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.041   21:1|  5.1|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.24  100|  0|  0
    220107/1100Z  17  31010KT  30.1F  SNOW    9:1| 0.1|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.006   21:1|  5.1|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.24  100|  0|  0

     

    27:1 ratios, here we come!

    • Haha 1
    • Weenie 1
×
×
  • Create New...