Jump to content

Maestrobjwa

Members
  • Posts

    11,051
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Maestrobjwa

  1. Just now, WxWatcher007 said:

    If you set that as the bar you might as well make a reservation in The Panic Room. I wouldn't even lock in double digits up here and I don't have a quarter of the concerns imby. 

    I think warning level is achievable. From there, it's gravy IMO. 

    Warning level is my bar too...I haven't had one verify imby since 2016, so...I'd take 5-8"! I am curious about what the ceiling will be though...

  2. 8 minutes ago, MillvilleWx said:

    The stronger CAD signature is massive and was shown on every model run this evening. Keep that working and let the UL pattern fall over the next succession of days. A lot to track and we haven't even touched the mesoscale. 

    Could you elaborate a bit more (not that you haven't already done a lot elaborating of course!) about how the stonger CAD signature would impact on what you just mentioned about with the "warm nose" this run of the euro showed?

  3. 4 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

    Gfs doesn’t quite get the heavy qpf far enough NW to intersect where it’s cold enough NW of the fall line. But it’s been clueless on this wave (as it was the wave last week that gave some light snow to southern VA). 
     

    But I mean...at this point tho...according to your theory, shouldn't we be kinda rooting against a snowier solution for this wave anyway? Lol

  4. 11 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

    @Amped honestly the whole h5 track of the initial system is not ideal even on runs that show a big hit. We need that monster 50/50 to offset that. Or we need the system to trend south with the track of the initial system. 

    Uh...would you mind translating that a bit? Need what system to trend south of what now? Lol

  5. 1 minute ago, LeesburgWx said:

    Living in Leesburg may actually payoff for once here. But per the other thread, a more amped Monday storm may ahve a correlation to a weaker/more progressive/warmer Wednesday storm, right? At least that is how I read it.

    I think @psuhoffman was saying it was the opposite: that we want more amped to lower heights (still not entirely clear on what "heights" are, but I digress, lol). We want lower heights for a colder Wednesday system, I think.

    • Like 1
  6. 2 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

    Careful what you wish for. There is a correlation between how far south Monday’s wave comes and how far north Wednesday’s goes. We want Monday as amped and north as possible to suppress heights in front of Wed.  

    Always something...:rolleyes: So we basically don't want more snow out of the first wave?...

  7. Just now, NorthArlington101 said:

    Quick aside: regardless of its odds of actually happening, should we start a thread for Monday its more clear what is being talked about where?

    I was about to suggest the same thing. Getting a bit jumbled in here (but it's awesome to have that problem! :lol:)

  8. 5 minutes ago, WxWatcher007 said:

    Haha. What a fun track. I ended up with 22” in DC.

    Not to mention the easiest tracking ever...rock-steady agreement for like 7-8 days. Like...when does that ever happen? Lol It was like...okay, it's gonna snow, it's gonna snow big...get your shovels out--no doubts with that one!

  9. 15 minutes ago, losetoa6 said:

    Icon is a decent hit Monday .:snowing:

    Howard county lollie bullseye 5.5 inches 

    A bit of atmospheric memory on this one? Lol (thinking about how the southern regions got more rain lollies the last couple of months). Of course this snow greedy Baltimorian wants things to inch just a little further north! :D

×
×
  • Create New...