Jump to content

PackGrad05

Members
  • Posts

    1,564
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by PackGrad05

  1. 1 hour ago, NorthHillsWx said:

    Heck of a dry stretch setting up while it’s already been quite drive this entire month. Seeds of a drought? Haven’t mentioned that word in here for a few years 

    While the temperature isn't warm enough for my Bermuda to take off yet, I would like a little moisture to help green it up.  
    With that said, I've absolutely loved all the time outside my family has been able to spend...especially with no humidity and sweating to worry about.

  2. Unfortunately, yesterday was a big bust.  No other way to put it.  That just goes to show how complicated the science is.  With that said, both NWS and local mets consistently explained ways that this could end up being less of a big deal..  However, it is tricky because you want people to be prepared in case the ingredients do come together in a Level 3/4 fashion.

  3. Would you say that the probability of no tornados per unit area in a high risk area is the same as a tornado per unit area in the slight risk area?  

    Areas in the high risk had tornados.  A majority of the tornado reports (as of that graphic) were in the high area.  What percentage of the high risk area needs to have a tornado for it not to be considered a bust?  

    You could argue that sliver of the slight was also a bust since it had numerous warnings and a tornado report... or could you?

     

    • Like 1
  4. Here is the specific wording from RAH this afternoon.  They agree the wedge may be stubborn, but also believe the boundary will be the focus.  
     

    Quote
    
    Initially, that cold air damming regime of
    widespread low overcast, light rain and drizzle, and (dense) fog,
    will retard the nwwd retreat of the wedge front into cntl NC during
    the late morning to early afternoon hours Thu and mitigate the
    severe risk to its north. That boundary will also likely prove to be
    the locus of (SPC Moderate Risk) of severe, where frontal forcing
    will most likely overcome the warm layer/capping inversion

     

  5. As for central NC, RAH said earlier in their discussion they felt like the focus of the severe weather would be along US-1 (30 miles either side) due to location of the front and dynamics associated with it.  They actually mentioned this location would be the worst of it potentially.  This is something models would have a hard time showing in their output.  
    With that said, they also mentioned several caveats that could decrease the activity.  I hope all of them come true.

  6. Personally, I was surprised with the large moderate area for NC/SC.  I knew there would be a moderate area, but I was surprised at the northern extent of it.  
    I think this is where experience with CAD comes into play.  It will truly be a question of how far north and west the CAD erodes during the day...   The moderate area looks to align with your typical ice/rain border in winter weather. 

    • Like 3
  7. 46 minutes ago, Avdave said:

    IT will be trimmed back, I dont think we really get into the humid and moist airmass.  This is just like winter, we miss the meat of the storm here in the Triangle.  I rather be in Fayettenam or Lumberton to SC for this one if I want severe thunderstorms

    I'm surprised they went with the enhanced for such a large area so far in advance.  Seems it would've been better to go with a large slight and then increase to enhanced as needed.   Unless they wanted to raise awareness early.

×
×
  • Create New...