Jump to content

jbenedet

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    7,152
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by jbenedet

  1. 12 minutes ago, bch2014 said:

    This storm is a game of inches-Morgan City, only about 30 miles west of Houma, is going to come away unscathed. 
     

    They haven’t even gusted to 50.

    Kinda surprised no one has mentioned this. There’s a 1018 mb high over Georgia. Quite robust for this time of the year. The synoptic scale players favor a significant gradient wind. The west side is not seeing the synoptic ageostrophic flow associated with the synoptic scale gradient as Ida’s center is between their location and the surface high. The flip side is this is making for significantly more wind on the eastern side AND with a substantial fetch over water, all along the east coast of LA. Coastal flooding well away from the center? You betcha. Look at how much more tightly packed the isobars are on the eastern side vs western side, well away from the center.

    A6F2C941-7DEB-47C3-8CBE-408D02B5F49A.gif

    • Like 22
  2. 4 minutes ago, Quincy said:

    Pretty meh wind field outside of the immediate coast and area near landfall. 
    91301BF4-C3AE-494D-A204-010BB7F48B7E.thumb.jpeg.337de27640bd0b2423729d235116e8b8.jpeg

    I’m not opining based on impact to SE New Hampshire. 
     

    I’m fascinated and tracking out of interest for south coast, Long Island and SNE (for flooding risks). 
     

    wind absolutely not the big story outside of coastal LI and CT. Otherwise it’s storm surge layered on very high seas—coastal flooding. Heavy rainfall.

  3. The symmetrical look of yesterday was a facade of organizing—competing CoC’s under a “CDO”

    Today everything is coalescing around one CoC. This will look much more impressive on satellite in 3 -6 hrs.

    • Like 3
  4. I’m seeing some early signs that Henri is finally organizing around ONE center of circulation. He’s got a lot of work to do, but this very disheveled appearance looks like a “shedding” of the competing MLC, LLC state and evolution into a structure that is vertically stacked. Time is the limiting factor now.

    • Like 3
  5. Just now, SnowGoose69 said:

    I still find it hard to believe in 2021 models could be that far off with the track this close in.  Their cone seems somewhat absurd to me at 2pm tomorrow of NYC or Cape Cod.  It’s probably 98% it ends up within 10-20 miles of their current position forecast at that time 

    To be fair, this recurve scenario close to landfall means uncertainty is quite high, at very short lead times. This is just a general rule of thumb. Accuracy goes up once new forward velocity attained. 

    What it implies here is a capture (phase). When does that happen and to what degree? It’s a very complex interaction, unfortunately. 

  6. I like the NHC’s track. Risk vs guidance is still skewed west—the recent trends East have been due to much less (minimal) phasing with the UL trough, and not less ridging to the east. 

    The former is a much more uncertain —error prone—aspect of the forecast.

    • Like 3
  7. 2 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said:

    Ever been to Fishers Island? One of the grandest views of BI sound LI sound. Perhaps the best place to watch a cane with high bluffs. Golf course is silly sweet. Rocks on beach not so good. 

    I haven’t. But I’m intrigued. Are there local ferries out of Mystic?

  8. 10 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

    I was just looking at the tide charts for NYC ... Looks like the 8:55 am Sunday tide ..should the west correction become more real, is unfortunately timed rather well with the approach to the coast that morning.  

    If this thing is a category 2 and it is moving headlong, bee-lined into the Bite region on top of that high tide cycle...  oy

    As a benefit will see how much was (not) learned post Sandy. 

    A microcosm of our macroeconomic system 

     

  9. 1 minute ago, weatherwiz said:

    This x 1,000. 

    We can't get caught up over potential for hurricane force winds. A prolonged duration of gusts even 40-50 mph is going to do a quite a bit of damage. If we get into the 50-60 mph range...it will be on the ugly side. And well...that is becoming increasingly possible.

    Winds are never the focal point for these in general, especially up here. Storm surge, coastal flooding and heavy rainfall.

    • Like 5
  10. 3 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

    I don't really see a big Et transition on any guidance though. It just sort of gets tugged NW and then rapidly weakens. Wind fields still tight.

    Put on your New England climo hat. 
     

    i think some form of hybridization occurs but “how much”? Mostly tropical, slightly ET?  50/50?  My guess is more the former.

    • Like 1
  11. Also we judge hurricane category by wind speed—which doesn’t directly translate to surface pressure falls (min pressure) IF the radius is expanding.
     

    The forecast model for intensity based on wind speed doesn’t tell us nearly enough for a TC at 40N

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...