Gave this one a "D". Should have went with my instinct on First Call.
https://easternmassweather.blogspot.com/2021/02/february-9-snowfall-verification.html
February 9 Snowfall Verification: Meteorology vs "Modelology"
The Role of the Forecaster
Contemporary forecasting models are undoubtedly more skilled than ever before, and accordingly play a large role in the in the development of forecasts. However, there is a reason that they are referred to as "guidance". After all, if they were flawless, then there would be no need for meteorologists. Thus it is incumbent upon the forecaster to utilize discretion when incorporating this data into a forecast. The primary role of the forecaster is to utilize a blend of a foundational understanding of how the atmosphere operates, a knowledge of climatology and forecasting experiences to distinguish when said guidance is accurately, and when it is in error. Sometimes it is important for the forecaster to resist the innate urge to relay on this guidance, instead deferring to a visceral, "gut" instinct that is incongruent with the data.
This poor forecast was a splendid illustration of this.
Here is the snowfall from yesterday across the region:
The prevailing thought process that guided the First Call was that snowfall would be light, due to very meager frontogenesis and OMEGA (lift), which obviously ended up very close to reality.
However, guidance inexplicably became more aggressive in terms of snowfall during the day on Monday, thus the Final Call was begrudgingly adjusted accordingly, against better judgement.
This was obviously too aggressive, and thus a bad forecast that resulted from the over reliance upon guidance.
The lesson here is practice meteorology, not "modelology".
Learn to trust your instinct as a forecaster-
Final Grade: D
Perhaps the saving grace is that the pattern over the course of the next week looks likely to provide ample opportunity for redemption.