Jump to content

40/70 Benchmark

Members
  • Posts

    73,224
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 40/70 Benchmark

  1. 57 minutes ago, bluewave said:

    Yeah, that is my early guess based on past multiyear La Ninas since the late 90s.

    There is usually one year with a strong +PNA December mismatch. The other surrounding Decembers had either a weaker positive or a negative PNA.

    So I will go lower on the PNA for December 2025 than the +1.70 we had in December 2024. But not sure yet whether it’s just a weaker positive or the PNA dips negative. 
     

    Multiyear La Ninas and December PNA

    2025…….?

    2024….+1.70

     

    2022….-0.66

    2021….-2.56

    2020…+1.58


    2017…..+0.89

    2016….-0.35

     

    2011….+0.36

    2010….-1.78

     

    2008….-1.41

    2007…..+0.14

     

    2000…..+1.23

    1999…..+0.21

    1998…..-0.09

    I think it's a no-brainer to take the under on last year....odds are two La Nina seasons with a deeply -PDO will feature an extremely +PNA.

  2. 1 hour ago, bluewave said:

    There has been a new relationship between the -PDO and PNA especially during the 2020s summers. This was our first July streak of 5 consecutive -2 to -4 -PDOs. There has been a very strong +PNA signal leading to the record wildfires, record heat, and drought up in Canada.

    Past instances of -2 -PDOs in July were more -PNA. My guess is that this is related to the -PDO being more driven by the warmer SST anomalies than the colder ones which used to dominate -PDOs in the past. 
     

    Recent July -2 to -4 -PDOs have been more +PNA

    IMG_4425.png.83f192b0031f993ffc29d7106a2d67ca.png

     

    Older -PDO below -2 in July were more -PNA

    IMG_4426.png.1c805919a0a8b515f6dcc6feee7c7fd4.png

     

     

    1 hour ago, snowman19 said:

    My guess is that the PNA is more negative during the winter than last year….2nd year -ENSO

     

    6 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

    And I agree, as it was strongly positive last year, but I don't think it will be strongly negative this season.

     

  3. 5 minutes ago, snowman19 said:

    My main reason is the PDO which can obviously change between now and December. Maybe I should have been clearer, not a total elimination, but it would be the very last on my analog list as of now

    Yea, the PDO and PNA part ways relatively frequently, as was the case last season. This is probably why the PNA in many of my analogs isn't as negative as you seem to think.

  4. 12 minutes ago, snowman19 said:


    It is negligible yes, but if I’m not mistaken, the MEI is deeper into Niña mode this year

    Don't get me wrong....I try to be pretty objective and back you up on plenty of takes, but you seem to be reaching here to eliminate that season from consideration altogether. The MEI hasn't been update since May, so perhaps you are mistaken. The RONI is -.40 and rising....

  5. 27 minutes ago, snowman19 said:

    IMO we are more “Niña” than 13-14 was

    Negligible. I seem to recall you questioning whether there was a discernible difference between ENSO neutral and weak La Nina when people were questioning whether this would become an official La Nina....is that particular take context dependent?

  6. 1 hour ago, WxWatcher007 said:

    I know that’s true…but my production the last decade makes it harder than ever to discern. I checked this morning and I have more sub 20” seasons than I do 30” seasons since 2018-19, and my average is 45-50”. I certainly have more failed epic winter patterns than failed fantasy canes. It’s exceptionally tough sledding for anything interesting lately. Tropical stuff aside I think most of us are frustrated by that. 

    I have my annual peak season forecast due by the 20th, and I’m still not sure what direction I’ll take. I do think we’re looking at another backloaded season though given the continued SAL/stability issues I knew we’d have months ago.

    If September is warm with a WAR, we’re in the game. Otherwise, cutoff trough season in October and hybrids are probably our only shot at anything interesting. 

    So doesn't Miami...what is the value of that perfunctory assessment? The volume disparity makes it silly to compare. When you put things into respective regarding how anomalous the prior decade was in the opposite direction, the current drought is still largely regression attibutable. I know my 10 year average just slipped blow normal this past year....but frustrating, nonetheless.

    • Like 1
  7. 10 minutes ago, bluewave said:

    I think what we have been seeing from that record warm pool east of Japan in the 2020s is a seasonal shift from the summer into the fall and winter. The SST anomalies have been peaking there during the summers. Then declining as we have moved into the winter.

    Notice how the -PDO readings have also been following this pattern. The summer into fall 2021, 2022, and 2024 displayed a similar process. The lowest -PDO readings have occurred in the summer and fall and have risen into the winter. So the 21-22, 22-23, and 24-25 winters were all rising PDO patterns off the strongly negative values of the summer and fall.

    The main theme is that this seasonal pattern has kept repeating. So the winter values can’t get high enough to reverse the PDO when it starts declining again into the summers.  

    The SSTs are marker for the 500mb ridging which keeps returning to the same areas. So even when we had a weaker trough east of Japan last winter, the SSTs couldn’t fully cool down. This could be related to the deep subsurface warmth there. Then there could be a feedback process between the atmosphere and SSTs perpetuating the 500mb pattern and extended record SSTs and -PDOs.

    IMG_4419.png.929f4be467c3d0217b17b34e160e90c9.png
    IMG_4421.png.07bb27c8230bea45fb1f5c13a8de20d0.png

    Yes, I'm not necessarily arguing for a wholescale pattern change....just a rising PDO that will be somewhat less negative.

    • 100% 2
  8. 6 minutes ago, BarryStantonGBP said:

    So Ed was a nothingburger

    Got it

    One thing I have learned is to always assume a harder recurve with respect to systems paralleling the coast, UNLESS there is a patently obvious reason not to, such as vigorous ULL absorbing the system....which are exceptionally rare occurences. This is why major NE strikes are so exceedingly rare.

    • Like 3
  9. 7 hours ago, Windspeed said:

    Hello, yee old farts. It's been a while. Looks like Erin managed to shake off the drier air to the north by closing off a nice bubble and pocket of moist air in the 850 to 500 hpa layers with continued convective bursting near low level vorticity this past evening. It has managed to do this with relatively marginal SSTs (26°-27°C range) since leaving the Cabo Verdes. The COC will be moving into 27°+C during the daylight hours on Wednesday. Erin should continue organizing, and it's pretty clear this system will become the first Atlantic major hurricane for 2025 in a few days' time.

    Downstream implications for land interaction are still too early. Granted, it may swing and miss the Eastern CONUS, but there remains some uncertainty for Bermuda and even the Canadian Maritimes depending on trough interaction. Otherwise, Erin should be a powerful CV long-tracker and ACE machine.

    04736bbbd8995bcfff038ac6039484b5.gif

    Agree concerning those land features. This was never much of a concern for the US IMHO.

  10. 13 hours ago, snowman19 said:


    If the tropical cyclone activity stops, those waters/SSTs off Japan are going to warm right back up again quickly. Those extremely warm waters go to depth, they aren’t just at the surface. @Bluewave showed the subsurface anomaly cross-section back in the spring I believe, they go to depth

    I will confidnetly bet against the PDO returning to those levels during the upcoming cold season.

    • Like 3
    • 100% 1
  11. 14 hours ago, GaWx said:

    That means the equivalent daily NOAA PDO has risen from ~-4.25 to near -3.

    Everything that I am looking at says an extreme/ record PDO at this time of year is gong to elevate percipitously as we head into winter, which isn't a shock...one direction in which to go. Obviously it will be negative this winter.

    • Like 1
  12. 2 hours ago, WxWatcher007 said:

    For our friends in the Antilles, this is increasingly becoming a little close for comfort. Could be some indirect impacts there that become more direct if the south shift continues. To @40/70 Benchmark’s point earlier, that can muck things up if the ridge also ends up trending stronger or the big ULL in Canada is weaker in the long range. Still a lot to sort out here.

    I'm sitting this one out regardless due to an impending trip to Africa, but I do not foresee a big US threat.

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...