Occasional Thoughts on Climate Change

[Brewbeer]

I'm suggesting that the scientists posting here who support more aggressive action to respond to AGW are posting facts, while you are posting opinions

 

[ChescoWx]

On 10/16/2026 at 8:40 AM, chubbs said:

Per the caption title "this data should not be used assess the number of events because of changes in data reporting". The science consensus is clear that climate change is going to lead to increased disaster risk, mainly due to increased event intensity.  Here's a report on climate impacts by the US insurance industry. 

https://coalitionforaninsurablefuture.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Climate-impact-on-insurance-May-2026.pdf

The minute we put the words scientific and consensus together we know it is fake news!

[Cobalt]

34 minutes ago, ChescoWx said:

The minute we put the words scientific and consensus together we know it is fake news!

The moment you stamp a 300 word signature below each of your posts we know how desperately difficultly you are trying to plaster your pseudoscientific narratives all across this board.

[Cobalt]

the fact that these two threads have comparable viewership and posting rates is laughable and abhorrent. The thread along with its author shouldve been laughed off this board years ago.

[WolfStock1]

4 hours ago, Brewbeer said:

I'm suggesting that the scientists posting here who support more aggressive action to respond to AGW are posting facts, while you are posting opinions

 

 

That would be your opinion, and an incorrect one.   I could enumerate the many facts that I have posted the past few days, which have *not* been refuted, but it wouldn't matter, since you ignore it all in your blindness and obstinance.