Brewbeer Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago I'm suggesting that the scientists posting here who support more aggressive action to respond to AGW are posting facts, while you are posting opinions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChescoWx Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago On 10/16/2026 at 8:40 AM, chubbs said: Per the caption title "this data should not be used assess the number of events because of changes in data reporting". The science consensus is clear that climate change is going to lead to increased disaster risk, mainly due to increased event intensity. Here's a report on climate impacts by the US insurance industry. https://coalitionforaninsurablefuture.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Climate-impact-on-insurance-May-2026.pdf The minute we put the words scientific and consensus together we know it is fake news! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cobalt Posted 25 minutes ago Share Posted 25 minutes ago 34 minutes ago, ChescoWx said: The minute we put the words scientific and consensus together we know it is fake news! The moment you stamp a 300 word signature below each of your posts we know how desperately difficultly you are trying to plaster your pseudoscientific narratives all across this board. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cobalt Posted 16 minutes ago Share Posted 16 minutes ago the fact that these two threads have comparable viewership and posting rates is laughable and abhorrent. The thread along with its author shouldve been laughed off this board years ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now