Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,509
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Toothache
    Newest Member
    Toothache
    Joined

Global Indices/map questions thread


weatherwiz

Recommended Posts

What's the difference between 2m and 850 hPa?

 

2m is just above the surface readings ~6ft, usually just temps are measured.

 

850hPa is ~5,000 feet or ~1700m give or take the location at which you are trying to measure. This is an important layer for p-types in winterstorms.

 

Hope that maybe answers your question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2m is just above the surface readings ~6ft, usually just temps are measured.

850hPa is ~5,000 feet or ~1700m give or take the location at which you are trying to measure. This is an important layer for p-types in winterstorms.

Hope that maybe answers your question.

Yeah definitely thank you.

Do you know where I can find a free euro 2m map? Tropical tidbits only had 850 for the euro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah definitely thank you.

Do you know where I can find a free euro 2m map? Tropical tidbits only had 850 for the euro

 

I havent been able to find it on free sites. I have access to accu pro for the Euro.

 

In a mets opinion or anyone for that matter, which is the most important teleconnection index for snowfall/storms in SNE?  +PNA/-NAO/-AO combination?

There is no definitive on that. you can have a positive NAO and get a snowstorm in SNE and other places as we have seen in the past. AO relates more to a cold or warm pattern from what im seeing and correlates well, sometimes, with the NAO. The PNA can only amplify the scenario of the AO and NAO.

 

If i had to say a tele that works best I would say NAO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I havent been able to find it on free sites. I have access to accu pro for the Euro.

 

There is no definitive on that. you can have a positive NAO and get a snowstorm in SNE and other places as we have seen in the past. AO relates more to a cold or warm pattern from what im seeing and correlates well, sometimes, with the NAO. The PNA can only amplify the scenario of the AO and NAO.

 

If i had to say a tele that works best I would say NAO

If I could choose one index to have on my side, it would be the EPO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For large SNE snowstorms, I believe the PNA is the single most important index...but it is less important for us than it is down in the M.A.

 

If you are simply talking like 6"+ snow events, then the PNA becomes even less important and the AO is probably the most important factor...EPO is close too, but it only means there's a lot of cold available and not necessarily a good pattern for snow. For these 6"+ events, it is far more important to have an active pattern than anything else...so the index numbers themselves don't have the highest correlations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For large SNE snowstorms, I believe the PNA is the single most important index...but it is less important for us than it is down in the M.A.

 

If you are simply talking like 6"+ snow events, then the PNA becomes even less important and the AO is probably the most important factor...EPO is close too, but it only means there's a lot of cold available and not necessarily a good pattern for snow. For these 6"+ events, it is far more important to have an active pattern than anything else...so the index numbers themselves don't have the highest correlations.

True....I was speaking more winter in general, while he was asking specifically about large sne snowstorms. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another question...something like this I've never understood.  See how across much of the central/eastern United States you have below-average height anomalies while across Canada you have above-average height anomalies (which don't seem to be associated with any ridging judging by the looks of the heights.  How/why would something like this happen?

 

cansips_z500a_nhem_1.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It happens because naturally when there are higher heights in the upper latitudes, that cold and its associated lower heights drift southward, into the mid latitudes.

 

Remember, everything is RELATIVE.....thus these are anomalies.

Just because there are higher heights over some eskimo's hut, doesn't mean it is warmer up there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It happens because naturally when there are higher heights in the upper latitudes, that cold and its associated lower heights drift southward, into the mid latitudes.

 

Remember, everything is RELATIVE.....thus these are anomalies.

Just because there are higher heights over some eskimo's hut, doesn't mean it is warmer up there.

 

just got a similar answer from someone else and now that I see that it makes a tremendous amount of sense.  

 

So basically in this case that portion of Canada is under a very weak trough but associated with height anomalies which are still way above-average.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just got a similar answer from someone else and now that I see that it makes a tremendous amount of sense.  

 

So basically in this case that portion of Canada is under a very weak trough but associated with height anomalies which are still way above-average.  

Yea....think about what a trough is.....its a dipping south of the jet stream, bringing polar air southward.

Well, what is going to happen near the pole when you remove that very cold air?

It will modify.......heights are lowest up there when the jet is tight and constricted, ala positive AO.

It bottles the cold up there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea....think about what a trough is.....its a dipping south of the jet stream, bringing polar air southward.

Well, what is going to happen near the pole when you remove that very cold air?

It will modify.......heights are lowest up there when the jet is tight and constricted, ala positive AO.

It bottles the cold up there.

 

Holy ****...dude that's a great concrete way to break it down and think about it.  

 

I'm like writing a revised winter outlook b/c of how late it already is.  What I'm doing is virtually recapping December and why December happened the way it did and then just discussing how the pattern may evolve going forward...I've been working on a Jan. forecast for like 7 hours now lol...not really sure what to do.  The pattern definitely looks to change, at least for the first part of the month, however, the one issue just seems to be a lack of cold...not that this means anything when it comes to snow potential.  I may leave out snow/precip forecast though only b/c I have zero confidence with that sort of stuff.  I should have this posted in the AM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Holy ****...dude that's a great concrete way to break it down and think about it.  

 

I'm like writing a revised winter outlook b/c of how late it already is.  What I'm doing is virtually recapping December and why December happened the way it did and then just discussing how the pattern may evolve going forward...I've been working on a Jan. forecast for like 7 hours now lol...not really sure what to do.  The pattern definitely looks to change, at least for the first part of the month, however, the one issue just seems to be a lack of cold...not that this means anything when it comes to snow potential.  I may leave out snow/precip forecast though only b/c I have zero confidence with that sort of stuff.  I should have this posted in the AM

Its great to get it right, don't get me wrong, but half of the reason why we exert ourselves in these arduous efforts is to grow from them.

If you do everything you can to learn as much as you can, and then avail yourself of the mistakes by converting errors into opportunity, then the verification will ultimately come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its great to get it right, don't get me wrong, but half of the reason why we exert ourselves in these arduous efforts is to grow from them.

If you do everything you can to learn as much as you can, and then avail yourself of the mistakes by converting errors into opportunity, then the verification will ultimately come.

 

I completely agree...I try not to get myself down for getting something wrong b/c you need to take that experience in order to grow and continue learning.  If you were to get it right all the time you probably would never push yourself to want to learn or understand more.  

 

The great thing with long-range forecasting (and forecasting in general) is there will always be something to learn.  For example, I've become pretty obsessed with the stratosphere and such and just trying to learn as much as I can and study.  I just wish I had more free time to do so...between work and school I get virtually no free time and when I do I'm too exhausted to do anything lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Does anyone know of a good place to read up on AAM? Im trying to better understand its effects and have been unable to find decent sites or articles for explanation.

 

Also if possible are there sites to be able to get the data?

 

This...I've been searching as well.  

 

As for data...sign up here 

 

http://info.wdtinc.com/wdt-futures-offers-aam-plots

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...