Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,532
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    e46ds1x
    Newest Member
    e46ds1x
    Joined

8.7 Magnitude Earthquake in Northern Sumatra


Recommended Posts

from USGS

Magnitude 8.7 - OFF THE WEST COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA

2012 April 11 08:38:38 UTC

Earthquake Details

  • This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.

Magnitude 8.7 Date-Time

Location 2.348°N, 93.073°E Depth 33 km (20.5 miles) Region OFF THE WEST COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA Distances 434 km (269 miles) SW of Banda Aceh, Sumatra, Indonesia

550 km (341 miles) SW of Lhokseumawe, Sumatra, Indonesia

963 km (598 miles) W of KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia

1797 km (1116 miles) WNW of JAKARTA, Java, Indonesia Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 14 km (8.7 miles); depth +/- 2.8 km (1.7 miles) Parameters NST=243, Nph=243, Dmin=514.3 km, Rmss=1.67 sec, Gp= 36°,

M-type=regional moment magnitude (Mw), Version=8 Source

  • Magnitude: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)
    Location: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)

Event ID usc000905e

map

vhm6p.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

'destructive' tsunami have hit Aceh according to CNN

Not sure where you were getting this from, but here is the latest I've read off the CNN blog

6:18 a.m. ET:) According to Andaman Nicobar islands disaster-management commissioner Punya Salila Srivastava there’s NO report of any tsunami generation along the Indian archipelago so far. “There’s no update. Nothing to say more at the moment,” she said.

She told CNN authorities have “downgraded the warning” to an “alert” in Car Nicobar, the northernmost of the Nicobar region.

(6:24 a.m. ET:) Indonesia's president says there is no immediate threat of a tsunami from earthquake. He was speaking at a joint press conference in Jakarta with visiting UK Prime Minister David Cameron, ITN's Gary Gibbon tells CNN.

(6:30 a.m. ET:) Australian seismologist Gary Gibson tells CNN it is less likely that a tsunami will be generated as the earthquake moved horizontally rather than vertically, as happened in 2004.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably false then?? Just posted it here as soon as i heard it on International CNN, hence the quotation marks..

Seems like conflicting reports out there though, a friend from Malaysia told me he heard 3-6m waves on their local TV, while someone from singapore say they've heard 50-80cm waves in Northern Indonesia.. No confirmation obviously...

But no tsunami is great news of course

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I heard something on the news that the energy did not cause a major rise. Perhaps more horizontal than vertical? Either way that is still a big quake to be recorded. That region is hot.

Not sure where you were getting this from, but here is the latest I've read off the CNN blog

6:18 a.m. ET:) According to Andaman Nicobar islands disaster-management commissioner Punya Salila Srivastava there’s NO report of any tsunami generation along the Indian archipelago so far. “There’s no update. Nothing to say more at the moment,” she said.

She told CNN authorities have “downgraded the warning” to an “alert” in Car Nicobar, the northernmost of the Nicobar region.

(6:24 a.m. ET:) Indonesia's president says there is no immediate threat of a tsunami from earthquake. He was speaking at a joint press conference in Jakarta with visiting UK Prime Minister David Cameron, ITN's Gary Gibbon tells CNN.

(6:30 a.m. ET:) Australian seismologist Gary Gibson tells CNN it is less likely that a tsunami will be generated as the earthquake moved horizontally rather than vertically, as happened in 2004.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like the quake was more of a lateral strike slip movement than an upward thrusting movement, so if that's true the tsunami threat should be very minimal. Can't displace much water vertically when you have lateral side to side movement. For those who don't know how tsunamis work, very basically put water is displaced vertically from the earthquake when thrusting occurs vertically (seafloor itself displaced upward) and when that water is pulled back down by gravity it spreads out from the center. The sheer volume and kinetic energy causes the huge speeds going outward. That's why when the earthquake is more side to side the threat is minimal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...