Jump to content

radarman

Members
  • Posts

    13,100
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by radarman

  1. 9 hours ago, bubba hotep said:

    Things were very impressive looking this evening while out on my run. Was thinking that outflow boundary that was rolling in might fire a local storm but no such luck. 

     

    Yeah that was a nice looking OFB.  Had the radar at UNT on and when I saw that thing rolling in I was wondering if I might need to activate the entire network.  Decent storms way up there.

  2. I think one of the reasons totals are reduced out here is poor snow growth not just qpf issues. Baking powder, I just shoveled and it's surprisingly heavy.

    This. I attribute the lackluster totals to poor growth and a somewhat glancing blow. Boxing Day I felt had more meso/micro climate reasons that caused the underperformance even though that was also a bit of a glancing blow for us N of Springfield as well. I had a massive radar hole rip open over my head in Noho that night.

    The classic valley screwgie is 12/92 and these were certainly not that for many reasons.

  3. I was wondering about that!

    That Is a key ingredient for obscene totals in Boston .....

    I was trying to load my fav meso model for CF stuff but the 4KM BTV WRF at 12z won't load for me

    Dick Albert (remember him old weenies) is Chuckin em' on Harvey's Twitter

    "This storm could be top 5 in Boston.

    In addition more snow later in week.

    In addition, some of coldest weather in years in early February."

    Yikes do we have to be old to remember Dick Albert?

  4. One thing I found interesting was the recommendations to radar operators to be more active changing PRFs during storm events to avoid range-folding at constant distances from the individual radars, and VCPs to reduce time between the lowest scans. In the event of a singular discrete supercell this may be feasible, but when all hell is breaking loose, with multiple TORs and developing cells (a la 4/27, 5/24, or even to a lesser extent 6/1) expecting the radar guys to execute these changes quickly for multiple radars is a lot to ask. It seems an ideal candidate task for an end-to-end optimized system.

  5. It may have already been mentioned but as much as a degree nowadays, it's the skill set that comes along with the degree that will likely prove useful going forward. If you're becoming adept at data processing with statistical methods, coding in a few different languages, predicting future events based on a number of factors, working odd hours, etc. it will serve you well regardless of what you end up doing. A lot of folks are changing hiring practices, looking for people with tools to attack variable problems, rather than just a degree in XYZ. Most folks I know are wearing several hats at their jobs, and therefore a variety of skills are necessary.

×
×
  • Create New...