Jump to content

USCG RS

Members
  • Posts

    2,479
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by USCG RS

  1. This was the issue with this run. We should not be writing this off in any way shape or form.
  2. That's the thing here, it's all about the phase, and to nail that down is very hard. There is no blocking, it's all about the phase, a phase which can be off by 3-6 hrs or "on" by 3-6 hrs. This is well within the standard deviation (ie within the margin of error) of all models. It's why I'm not done with this and why the Euro may still be a better option. Aloft it is very close, even with the models which miss.
  3. Yeah, that to me is the caveat here: where does it bomb out? Late and it scoots NE.
  4. If you're going to show that, you can't forget about what's going on aloft.. Which is phenomenal for the area.
  5. This is true.. However, the changes that take place at at hr 24-48 set the stage for 84. Obviously not set in stone... But higher confidence due to that.
  6. Lost? No. But it has been having trouble with certain patterns as of late. However, regarding KUs, I still trust the Euro over all. Personally regarding the GFS, I think the most recent pattern has been playing to its bias of holding energy back. I don't think it's been wonderful, it's gotten lucky IMHO. It has been par for the course with storms once they are on the eastern seaboard. Etc. My prediction is that this is going to a be a strong hit for the Tri-State, long island especially. Unfortunately, as the post pointed out, there is so much energy around that the slightest change will make a huge sensible difference regarding total accumulation, winds, and the like. This is outside of the skill of most - if not all- models. However, the Euro has been consistent and with its resolution, I'm not just going to write it off (even though 0z shows just how delicate the set up is) Now - if you're asking about my gut? I think this is going to be a heavy hitter. But that's simply my gut feeling here.
  7. Yeah supply chains are not wonderful right now
  8. Exactly. I wrote this elsewhere.. But feel it would make sense here as well.. Folks, let's have a chat about why surface depictions of storms are not really what to look for in models. For reference anything with h/H in it is designating height in mb. For example, h925 is 925 mb where as h85/7/5 is 850mb/700mb/ and 500mb respectively. The governing physics of weather is such that the upper levels (h925 and above) are what govern sensible weather (ie what precip falls, how much, winds, etc). For winds, you want to look at h925. The winds here are what can mix down. Normally you take a 10-15% reduction, however, that is not always a hard and fast rule. For precip type, a good rule of thumb is to look at h85 and h925. If h85 is below freezing, there's a good chance the precip is frozen, and likely snow (there are exceptions when there are warm pockets above h85). If it is above freezing, it is likely liquid. Now if h85 is above freezing and h925 is close to freezing or below, there is a good chance you are looking at freezing rain. If h85 and h925 are above freezing, most likely it is plain rain. The exception here is if you have a very shallow yet very cold surface layer and/or the ground has been frozen for a good period of time (ie a cold spell for a few days) and sfc temps are just at or very slightly above freezing. Usually lighter precip helps to aid this exception as well. For precip rates, you want to look at H7. H7 will show you where the model thinks the best forcing is going to be as well as the available energy for precip. H7 is about frontogenic forcing. Lastly, let's look at H5. I won't go into h3/250 as that is beyond the scope of this post. So for H5, this is where you look for phases and energies moving across the continent. So, the 0z GFS slipped east about 75 miles. If you just look at that, well.. Then to you all hope is lost. Yet if you look up at H5, you see that one of the energies phased slightly early, causing a slightly late capture of another energy, ie, phasing late. This allowed the surface low pressure to slip east. However, when you look through the energies at H5, you quickly begin to realize that a less than 3 hour difference in any one of the energies - and consequential phasing - would have changed the outcome (Ala 6z Euro). I'm not going to go too deep into H5 energies as if you have been following along, you would have seen this explained in here before. If you have not been, follow along from here and look out for what this post has pointed out. To go into h5 energies and orientations would be too long a post and likely confusing as each phase and energy act differently depending on location, speed, strength, etc. It's best to just observe for this moving foreward. One last thing regarding upper levels. For a coastal storm (or in the Midwest when a storm explodes and runs up from the gulf), you want to be NW of the various closing off of lows at the upper levels. When low pressure systems develop, they develop from SE (at the sfc) to NW (through H5). This diagonal development with regard to height in the atmosphere allows each low pressure center at each level to vent (ie expel air up and outward so that the pressure can fall. Remember, in layman's terms, pressure is essentially a measure of how much air is in any given space at any given time). So as you always want to be NW of the sfc low pressure for frozen precip, you want to be NW of H85 for snow and NW of H7 for the best snowfall rates. When H7 moves directly over or West your area, this is when you can dry slot and when h85 moves over or west of your area, you have h85 temps which shoot above freezing and this changes your snow to other types of precip (remember we talked about upper levels temps earlier). These are just some general rules to keep in mind with these types of storms and why the surface depictions on models are really the laziest type of forecasting and produces poor forecasting skills and verification. It is also why I am not writing this storm off at all. Last note - the Euro with its resolution tends to pick up on these rules the best. This is why it used to be the gold standard.
  9. What would your translate that to in regard to sensible weather
  10. Yes. Much higher heights out west as well, which allows the EPO to go rather negative as the air is being forced up and over the ridge, grabbing cold air and spilling it into the eastern US. This in turn is also creating a bit of confluence, aiding in slowing down as well as keeping the cold over the coastal areas. Likewise, it keeps baroclynicity off of the coast AND forces the Hudson Valley short wave towards the phase as well.
  11. I think those really analyzing the run are saying this is actually slightly west with the sfc LP. A hair.
  12. Not really. The capture is happening at that time. On the 12z it slungshot north after this.
  13. Speaking of winds, I am rather concerned with the winds showing up for Long Island, especially Suffolk.
  14. You and your logic and scientific reasoning. Psh.
  15. It actually might be. Models have issues resolving this type of energy and you need to do some investigative work. I would lean towards the west contours given how the storm is exploding.
  16. Thats a bomb. That legit is a bomb. Holy F.
  17. 952mb at benchmark would bury the entire region. This isn't a warm core storm of tropical origin where it will be nice and compact from developing so quickly. Assuming this is still baroclynically driven.. That precip shield will fan out quite nicely.
  18. Yeah, unfortunately we are relying on phase and phase alone
  19. Meteorologists, emergency managers, politicians were all sued because of the restrictions enacted due to the forecast
  20. #banned! Maybe? I'll uh... I'm just gonna go
  21. Tbh, gfs was pretty close to a hit. The phase was just a hair shy
  22. Are you talking about the one by Dr Yang in 2015?
×
×
  • Create New...