Jump to content

DDweatherman

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5,231

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by DDweatherman

  1. DDweatherman
    Sadly that still left it quite a bit east, but our focus in the 95 and west area has to be on the arctic front associated precip
  2. DDweatherman
    It's not like any of the PBP I've given is wrong... I said I wouldn't predict runs in advance. Its funny how some people appreciate it and appreciate it, and then there are others who don't.
  3. DDweatherman
    Can you hang it up now? It's time to be out
  4. DDweatherman
    Read my last post, I can't provide a 2 sentence explanation of whats going on to someone about the run if I want to be "first". Remember its not about being first, you said it. I'm here to give more practical info, not just be the first to post it. Easy to post wester and souther and a tad, etc. What if someone didn't see 6z or 0z?
  5. DDweatherman
    Not good haha, we need it to make some appreciable change with a cleaner phase and evolution. The next frame shows lower heights in the east from the TPV pressing down its influence. That flattens out our southern energy and creates a sloppier phase.
  6. DDweatherman
    Alignment of the northern and southern energy similar from 6z, but all of it happening a bit more west from last run.
  7. DDweatherman
    Unsure what you mean, you just said the same thing I said? AND it looked that way from 18 & 24, so whats the point you're making
  8. DDweatherman
    Through hour 18, GFS stronger with the energy diving down out of Canada, bringing it in slightly further west thus far Much of the same through 24 Watching the TPV up in Canada, looks similar to 6z thus far.
  9. DDweatherman
    Damn, and I was gonna sit the GFS out, but I'll give it a go for us one last time on this storm.
  10. DDweatherman
    The 12z RGEM is just not a fan of this storm, but it literally bounces back and forth so much
  11. DDweatherman
    0z was sharper than 12z at the base of the trof post phase, those 2 images show it pretty clearly
  12. DDweatherman
    Nah, it was a decent bit sharper if we're being honest. Shows clearly here
  13. DDweatherman
    trof axis is pretty similar, just a bit more tail from a slightly less clean phase. The axis of the northern energies dropping in isn't due N/S like 0z, but close
  14. DDweatherman
    Doesn't look all that far off from 0z at 54 if we're being honest. Better than 6z no doubt, but also not much worse than 0z
  15. DDweatherman
    TPV up NE is better aligned allowing some height rises over us... stressing how important that can be downstream
  16. DDweatherman
    Agreed, should be a bit better downstream provided the phase stays clean.
  17. DDweatherman
    Not really looking too closely at models this morning, but let's see if the NAM tries to suck us back in.
  18. DDweatherman
    Morning Mappy, the damn beer bet doesn't look good
  19. DDweatherman
    Night y'all, that wasn't what we needed. Gonna need the NAM/Euro overamped team in these situations to get one right.
  20. DDweatherman
    Now through 48 its a step back vs 18z, the S/S is west and N/S is east a bit on both
  21. DDweatherman
    TPV is pressing down a bit, thats all I'm seeing thus far.
  22. DDweatherman
    The important GFS frames are on the doorstep, not a step back from 18z yet which is a good start
  23. DDweatherman
    Truthfully the icon had better parts at h5, but its not that important
  24. DDweatherman
    RGEM & ICON round out the JV suite, GFS is the important one. Everyone take a coffee break for 20 mins...
  25. DDweatherman
    Don't disagree with you there...swings very wildly
×
×
  • Create New...