Jump to content

mimillman

Members
  • Posts

    3,333
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by mimillman

  1. Not sure what happened with the SREFs but 9z took a massive step towards an amped solution. 8” mean at ORD
  2. With the last event certainly better than the hi res guidance, and the GFS, which were atrocious
  3. I think you misunderstood. I think around 5”, perhaps locally more for where the FGEN sets up, and 2-5” for the area outside of that. Ultimately it’s not that different from the NWS map just posted, just slightly lower totals.
  4. I agree the FGEN placement is key for areas north and would me the difference between 2” and 5”, maybe slightly more locally. Hoping for anything else is not prudent. I almost consider the lake effect a different event considering it will be happening 12+ hours later and I’m not sure how LOT handles that. Perhaps WWA to lake effect snow advisory?
  5. I’m thinking more 2-5” from synoptic snows, but I could see the lake effect pushing us over 6 if we get lucky.
  6. 3z SREF came in weaker. I don’t think this is happening. Too much consensus from the globals and too much known amped bias from the hi res.
  7. Hey not bad for you too! The lake effect is the bright spot for us both IMO.
  8. Winter started for Chicago last Saturday too lol
  9. Globals all the way. I’ll tsle my 3” and LE and run
  10. This will be a winter to remember for central Illinois/Indiana/Missouri. More snow than most northern cities with 2x their annual norms
  11. Globals don’t like it tonight. I’d go with them over the NAM tbh
  12. Depending on how the rest of the suite comes in, we should see watches posted with the morning AFDs
  13. SREF plume continues to come in good. 21z mean at ORD is 7”
  14. I think combo of the ridge out west + PV orientation. Seems to be the theme
  15. PV orientation slightly further east allows the ridge out west to push our vortmax along...and further south.
  16. I don’t recall seeing any LE headlines in Cook for a couple years. Wonder if this weekend changes that.
  17. Eh certainly looked that way at 850 too. At 500 I see it was a bit north.
  18. The 12z GFS was south of the 6z up until hour 66, at which point SLP was northeast of the 6z run.
  19. The progression of SLP on the FV3 is exceptionally confusing.
  20. Nice lake effect signal for NE IL on Saturday night
  21. Southern stream faster at H5. 12z GFS should come south. Edit: Ends up in a similar spot at 6z at hour 66 though slightly faster.
  22. 12z NAM good for a few inches at least across much of the sub
  23. I hate spring. If winter could live forever I’d wish it upon us all
×
×
  • Create New...