Jump to content

mimillman

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,468

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by mimillman

  1. mimillman
    Nice? This would have been a top 5
  2. mimillman
    This is an eastern Iowa to Madison storm
  3. mimillman
    Doesn’t look great to me unless you’re looking for 3” of rain
  4. mimillman
    Agree, except I’d say 1-2” burbs. Cold rain, best track. Fitting for this winter, no way around it
  5. mimillman
    Fantastic low placement, terrible timing. There is no cold air.
  6. mimillman
    Just loving the Madison special call. I’m still liking my 1.9” of rain and 1” backside snow. This is going to be some painfully cold rain.
  7. mimillman
    Huge waste of today’s cold air
  8. mimillman
    I’ll be skiing in Colorado, so bring it on
  9. mimillman
    Notice how the high ice shield is continuously moving East on guidance as models slowly trend towards more reasonable amounts given the extremely marginal thermals. I anticipate that high ice shield keeps moving East until it’s gone
  10. mimillman
    Final call at MDW: 1.9” of rain, 1” of backside snow
  11. mimillman
    Given the low placement of the never-fails NAM, I would actually expect guidance to trend southeast.
  12. mimillman
    Not a bad idea
  13. mimillman
    That big “S” shape on H5 in the western PAC is the storm saying “Sucks to be you.” Or it could stand for “snow.” Either one is feasible.
  14. mimillman
    Can’t wait for the weather channel to name this
  15. mimillman
    Once again, with a halfway decent airmass, the subforum would be measuring this system in feet. Unfortunately that isn’t the case with this dogsh*t winter and a great set up goes to waste.
  16. mimillman
    You know it’s going to happen. Winter is only a Nov/Apr phenomenon now.
  17. mimillman
    On the bright side, I think it’ll be the coldest rain of the season. That means we’re trending in the right direction, right?
  18. mimillman
    The 6z Euro extrapolated certainly would be
  19. mimillman
    I would say boundary level temps are far too marginal for any significant icing anywhere near the metro, and precip rates are too high. Seems like 32-34 and rain followed by a few inches of slush. That’s verbatim of course, things can change.
  20. mimillman
    If there was even a half decent antecedent airmass to work with this would be a huge event for most of the subforum. Unfortunately it’s just not there
  21. mimillman
    I’m gone this weekend, leaving Friday, just before the storm. So Chicago bound to get crushed
  22. mimillman
    Zero
  23. mimillman
    Don’t believe that surface depiction. The high is too Far East for a decent ice set up anywhere west of the Apps
  24. mimillman
    Textbook symptom of a textbook -PNA
  25. mimillman
    The difference between a snowy/cold January and a warm/wet cutter January is that ridge being centered 500-1000 miles too far west.
×
×
  • Create New...