heavy_wx

Moderate snow with low-density fluff in this band. Reminds me of lake effect.

Getting some moderate-sized aggregates now in North Laurel.

Actual light snow here in southern Howard County.

Finally getting some bigger aggregates and moderate snow within the higher reflectivity area from PG County into Howard County. Correlation coefficient and ZDR suggest that southern AA and PG county are starting to mix.

Snow growth here in southern Howard County is still quite poor, with small single crystals.

Mostly needles in the lighter snow outside of the heavier bands here. Not too surprising given cloud-top temperatures in central MD are only around -10C.

Getting larger, more aggregated snow now corresponding to higher reflectivity (>20 dBZ) and ZDR closer to 0 dB.

Light snow with tiny flakes here.

Light snow here in southern Howard County with minimal accumulation so far.

There's a pretty consistent emergence of a warm layer on most guidance between ~800-900 mb (except the GEM/RGEM) ; 850-mb temperatures generally get above freezing up to the MD-PA border between 06-12z on the Euro. The duration of snowfall from the coastal low will depend on the degree of mesoscale forcing and the low track, and these features are highly correlated since the best mesoscale forcing is north of the 700-mb low.

The 700-mb temperature gradient is definitely tighter on the 12z GFS compared to 06z, leading to greater frontogenetic forcing over the I-95 region. The model is also a bit colder, but its forecast boundary layer is still warm enough for rain for a time near and SE of I-95. If the stronger dynamics verify, I think the boundary layer could be less of an issue, especially given the favorable surface high position in SE Canada. Of course we could have those issues if the models end up developing the surface cyclone farther northwest.

Lovely bifurcation of the mid-level flow! The resulting confluence promotes anticyclogenesis south of James Bay and cold-air damming into the mid-Atlantic.

Light to moderate snow here with a coating on the ground.

Good question; I'm not sure if the differences in the shortwave evolution are caused by something inherent in the model dynamics or differences in the model initial conditions.

Yes, the GFS keeps the 500-mb shortwave mostly coherent as it propagates from AZ on 12z Tuesday to the OH river valley, where it acquires a negative tilt.The shortwave on the Euro loses its coherence over the southwest, keeping some of the energy delayed as the feature moves eastward. The result is a flatter, positively tilted shortwave that produces less favorable interaction with the developing surface low. There's definitely potential with this system for snow in the mid-Atlantic, but I think there's too much uncertainty right now in how these features will evolve to be confident in any operational model solution.

Measured about 19" depth on the ground NW of Albany about an hour ago.

I plotted it from the level-2 NEXRAD data (https://registry.opendata.aws/noaa-nexrad/).

Just into the band here in Albany, finding a lot of dendrites and moderate-sized aggregates of dendrites. Corresponds to enhanced reflectivity, KDP, and ZDR within the band from KENX.

Some light snow started here within the last half hour just NW of Albany.

I'm up near the Albany area for this storm...I think it will be better here than where I'd usually be, along I95 in MD! My main concern is if the secondary mid-level (~700-mb) band stays just south of ALB, and we're stuck in the subsidence zone of the circulation during the period of heaviest snow.

There's a relatively good indication of 1-km AGL rotation from KLWX for the storm west of Baltimore City. Also some shear-induced size sorting evident in the relative placement of the ZDR and KDP maxima.

The new positives reported each day would eventually decrease if the infection rate of the virus slows (R0<1), even with increased testing. This happened in New York State, where they have seen both a decrease in # of positives and in increase in # of tests. https://covid19tracker.health.ny.gov/views/NYS-COVID19-Tracker/NYSDOHCOVID-19Tracker-DailyTracker?%3Aembed=yes&%3Atoolbar=no&%3Atabs=n

Sorry to hear. Hope you feel better soon.

As an example, NY state (as of the Governor's briefing today) has ~700 confirmed cases and 65 people currently in ICU beds. Beyond the confirmed cases, it's hard to know how many people are asymptomatic, so I take your point that the percentage could be lower when factoring in these unobserved cases. The troubling thing is that the number of confirmed cases increases exponentially with time, unless serious social distancing measures are implemented. Italy has *only* 24k cases but its health care system is overrun with COVID-19 patients in critical condition. 16 days ago, Italy had about the same number of cases NY has currently.