Jump to content

hawkeye_wx

Members
  • Posts

    5,944
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by hawkeye_wx

  1. 3 minutes ago, Cary67 said:

    Have to admit I am skeptical of some snow event lasting 60hrs. And the NAM at this range whatever it shows is toss worthy.

    I'm sure there will be some breaks.  Other models are showing a decent break after the initial wave.  Plus, the rotating spokes of energy will probably have dry moats mixed in.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  2. At the end of the NAM run, there is still solid snow falling from Cedar Rapids to Chicago/Milwaukee.

    The last snow system lasted four hours.  This week's event has the potential to last 60 hours.  Now, if we could just pair the 1"/hr rates from the last event with the 48+ hour duration of this one, we'd really have something.

    • Like 2
  3. 42 minutes ago, Hoosier said:

    #1 CIPS analog is 12/1/2007.  Was in LAF back then but remember that storm.  One difference is that the warm nose aloft back then was stronger/farther north, so the ice won't get as far north this time. 

    I received 1.5" of sleet and no snow from that storm.  Thankfully, tomorrow's system won't be a repeat.

  4. 31 minutes ago, Hoosier said:

    Currently leaning toward 2-3" on the front end here.  If it comes in under that, then this winter truly does suck.  Even the above total would pretty much make it my biggest snow of the season... pretty sad.

    2-3" is what I'm expecting here as well.

  5. 28 minutes ago, RCNYILWX said:

    00z GFS is not what you want to see for a good event...except for MN, central and northern WI, the UP and northern Lower MI.

    The GFS, today, has trended toward sharper upper energy, which causes the surface feature to extend up into Minnesota.  It seems a bit weird.  The other models are not doing this.  Any thoughts?

×
×
  • Create New...