Jump to content

paweather

Members
  • Posts

    10,280
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by paweather

  1. 2 minutes ago, Bubbler86 said:

    It is uncanny how up and down the tracking has been on this one.  It seems every 12 hours we have one suite threatening a little snow/a sunny day on Saturday and another driving a low too far north.  Goes to show how hard trying to put a forecast out is...the interactions are too complicated to pin down.

    Blizz shared the EURO it only goes out to 90 after that it dumps. 

  2. 18 minutes ago, MAG5035 said:

    Could be a couple of things. I won’t put words in anyone’s mouth but here’s my objective thoughts on some of the cons of this setup.

    Precip issues are still possible in the southern tier even with these lower QPF/progressive solutions depending on the thermals.. something we won’t have a firm handle of till we’re in range of the high res guidance. I do think we’ll see mostly snow in here from this, but the possibility of some mixing in the southern tier still exists. We’ve changed the pattern around to where it’s cold enough and we have a high available for this system, but it’s still not significantly cold here.. just cold that’s average. 

    The 500mb pattern out west  is not typically what you would see for a C-PA snowstorm. We’re always looking for the big western ridge and associated amplification to run a coastal storm all the way up the coast and we have the complete opposite with the -PNA setting up and a big western trough. What makes this work is having some downstream blocking and 50/50 low allowing this shortwave that kicks out from the southwest go underneath us. What’s being pointed out by some is these weaker solutions late today along with being faster come from more energy dumping into the southwestern trough (which eventually becomes our next headache next week)  making for a weaker shortwave (that becomes our weekend storm) that kicks out. That kind of evolution takes away the top end potential. This is still probably a half decent event but not a blockbuster 1-2 foot type thing. More of 4-8” kind of event is what I’m thinking right now for the swath of heaviest snow… which I think about anyone in here would be happy with. 

    Makes sense thanks Mag

  3. 6 minutes ago, Itstrainingtime said:

    MU finally said something about the weekend: "snow lovers should keep expectations in check" 

    Also indicated that the pattern does NOT match the model outputs.

    Detailed analysis tomorrow.

    Expectations being plowable check. 

    • Haha 1
  4. 9 minutes ago, Bubbler86 said:

    I hope you are joking.  LOL.  

    Check out this compare from 12 to 18Z.  12 has a dying primary/ULL in Ohio.  18 has little precip in far SW PA because there was little prescence in the Oh Valley.  Weaker and faster low. 

     

    image.png.b16244a9fc8654b87d2e2d2153eb0a08.png

     

     

    image.thumb.png.a4f46dae16b2bc959400a9fbccd866d4.png

     

    All in all the kuch range for my area has not changed that much.

    • Like 1
  5. CTP:

    The operational GFS, ECMWF, and Canadian models continue to
    show a similar story - isentropic ascent ahead of the storm
    system moving into the region by Saturday morning and becoming
    most vigorous by Sat afternoon into early Sat evening. By 00z
    Sunday, the dominant forcing transitions from isentropic ascent
    to fgen banding on the back side of the low, within a paired
    right entrance / left exit region of the upper jet. This
    scenario would result in several inches of snow across central
    PA. However, it is worth noting that there are still some
    ensemble members that keep most of the precip to the east,
    resulting in little to no snow accumulation for central PA. The
    range of possibilities shown by the NBM 10th and 90th
    percentiles ranges from a coating to 1 inch in the best case to
    over 1 foot of snow in some spots in the worst case scenario.
    
    There will be a period of dry weather later Sunday through
    Monday night before the next storm system approaches late Monday
    night. This storm looks to be stronger than the weekend storm,
    but also has the potential to track to our west, ultimately
    putting is in the warm sector after a period of cold air
    damming. In that case, there could be a several hour period of
    snow before a mix with and changeover to rain. However, it is
    much too early for details, as there is plenty of time for the
    track of this system to change. The presence of cold air ahead
    of this system will also depend and how much snowpack is left
    behind from the weekend storm.
  6. 1 minute ago, Bubbler86 said:

    I have to do something to counteract the silly comments I get about not using guidance past a certain hour....this after watching the big boys flip and flop today. 

    Lots of flip and flops today but that is all the time. I am still liking the chances of a quick 4-8" type storm. Power El Nino like. :snowman:

    • Like 1
  7. 9 minutes ago, Bubbler86 said:

    NAM AT RANGE WARNING----NAM AT RANGE WARNING

     

    At 84 hours the SLP is on the cusp of the Gulf near New Orleans in a very similar position as the 12Z CMC.    The approaching High is displaced a bit East vs, the CMC.  Looking at 500H it is going to go North East in some manner but would be guess work to suggest how. 

    NAM at range warning. You serious? LOL. 

  8. 14 minutes ago, MAG5035 said:

    To further on the 12z Euro EPS 

    3”+ probs

    image.thumb.png.be8eaeb15f01fea21e96d5914c412c60.png

     

    6+ probs

    Maybe

    Edit to note that the 12”+ probs are completely non-existent (no ensemble member showing 12+), so the ensemble overall has definitely picked up on the faster motion of this storm. 

    Maybe more like a 3-6 4-8 storm for us. Outside of this one model run. 18z up in the next couple of hours. 

×
×
  • Create New...