Jump to content

SchaumburgStormer

Members
  • Posts

    5,847
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SchaumburgStormer

  1. Might need one for the weekend storm if the euro holds serve
  2. We’re giving plenty of feedback...
  3. HRRR has a solid look for N IL. I am going to ride that and stick with a 6.2" call for MBY.
  4. But will have a record number of pivotal maps posted in it
  5. I get posting a noteworthy map, but this guy may as well be a hosting site
  6. This model madness has us pretty close to simply nowcasting.
  7. Multi-seasonal trends will not be denied. Delayed due to lack of data, but not denied
  8. These comments without any justification or support are the best, and add a lot to the conversation
  9. If nothing else, whatever this every drying, sheared wave drops will add to the snow over streak we have had. Had >1” of snowcover since December 29th.
  10. And you certainly don’t want to get caught with your pants down in a situation where you go from watch, to advisory, only to have warning criteria verify and have to upgrade mid storm.
  11. What a joke. No wonder the models have been bouncing all over the damn place
  12. The low just hangs of Kansas City for awhile while getting sheared out.
  13. Serious long duration snowfall. Will be a baller storm day of snow for those in the band.
  14. 54 hours, the low is in east Kentucky and it is still snowing back to Nebraska
  15. This run looks like a crush job for the 88 corridor. Cyclone banking big time too
  16. At 45hr, low is in the same place as it was at 18z. Slightly strong low
  17. SREF plumes for ORD continue to dump the lowballs. Mean up to near 8” with a big bunch between 8-12”
  18. I really like the area between mby and RFD based on trends. But of course, am waiting on high res models to inevitably shift things a bit
  19. Still some clunkers dragging things down, but 7.5” SREF mean at ORD with a bunch in double digits. This has all the ingredients to be an over performer, and I think somewhere in LOT will crack a foot.
  20. It’s fine to worry. Hell, I am worried about some sort of monkey wrench. Where I have an issue is with a “met” ignoring guidance to fit some sort of weird crusade for underperformance. If it indeed does underperform, then we can do a post analysis, but ignoring a consensus of modeling is simply bad forecasting and wishcasting
×
×
  • Create New...