Jump to content

weatherwiz

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    76,424
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by weatherwiz

  1. 1 minute ago, Go Kart Mozart said:

    If you look closely, does this imply a frontogen band near the NY CT border?

    gfs_T700_neus_18.png

    It's actually not uncommon to see two bands unfold in major storms like this. And they can be a forecast killer (in both directions) b/c you can get some serious subsidence between the two. In some cases the two bands will even consolidate and all hell just breaks lose under it

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  2. 2 minutes ago, jbenedet said:

    Yea and it would come in much faster. 12 hrs+. Would be a Friday/Saturday impact, rather than Sat/Sunday

    I could see that happening. Seems like more times than not we see timing sped up as we get closer...especially with no block in place. You can see the NAM probably hedging in that direction.

  3. 3 minutes ago, jbenedet said:

    The western Ridge keeps trending further west with time on guidance at around hr 72. An axis over western Washington state without any blocking in eastern Canada is typically a recipe for a cutter or very tucked in track. If the northern stream and southern stream cleanly phase early—around hr 72, this comes much further west than current guidance consensus—there’s plenty of “room” in terms of wave spacing.

    Not only a bit more west but also stronger (higher heights pushing slightly more north. 

  4. 1 minute ago, ORH_wxman said:

    NAM would prob be more than a light event....it is more amped than the 06z GFS was at 90h.

    Looks much better (favorable) with the ridging into the West and is slightly further west with the trough axis into the Gulf Coast. Would probably continue to see amplification too based on the jet. Still have a developing jet steak on the western side of the trough axis.

  5. Hopefully some of the recent changes in direction are not a product of starting to get better sampling (which would be not so good news) but the notable differences in the structures of just about everything...ridging in the West, evolution of the southern shortwave, the trough, and also the ULJ across the region is a bit concerning right now. We're not talking about subtle changes either. 

    • Like 1
    • Sad 1
  6. 4 minutes ago, CT Valley Dryslot said:

    NAM can't even give a consistent 24hr forecast.

    It moved the kicker vort 150mi east into NM at hour 27 compared to 6z!

    The differences in short-term between the NAM/GFS have been insane...and not just here but throughout the country. Finally there seems to be some agreement on that but even yesterday morning the NAM/GFS were worlds apart on that system. It's been that way with just about every weather system this winter across the country. 

    • Like 1
  7. 2 minutes ago, JC-CT said:

    Is it even inside the NAMs grid range right now

     

    Just now, CT Valley Dryslot said:

    I don't believe so. And it won't be for a few days.

    Not the storm but watching how the NAM starts to handle the evolution of the pattern across the eastern Pacific and western U.S. is certainly in range. 

    When there is storm potential we spend so much time focusing on the U.S. domain when in reality the domain of focus should be shifted much farther west to incorporate the Pacific. For example, models have been really been building the ridging into the western U.S. moving into Wednesday...well the processes and evolution of that is really starting over the Pacific now so understanding how the models are handling what's occurring over the Pacific may yield big clues.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...