Jump to content

weatherwiz

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    71,796
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by weatherwiz

  1. I killed a spider in the bathroom this morning. First spider kill of the season. It was on my sink. Probably came inside to avoid the foot of snow. Unfortunately he wasn't able to avoid the toilet paper that got him. I'm still like the mid-levels for a good chunk of SNE. Obviously that gradient in cutoff is going to be brutal somewhere.

  2. 2 minutes ago, DavisStraight said:

    Ill take this

     

    hrrr_asnow_neus_48.png

    Still the HRRR at the extending but not showing anything funky so that's good to see. 

    I'm wondering about the ratios on the HRRR though...its pretty warm at the sfc...not warm enough for PTYPE concerns but that would be a paste for many. Would certainly see some power concerns, even well into the interior. 

  3. The HRRR doesn't look terrible at all, just judging by SLP track. Happy to see so weird lows or dual lows. The low is more elongated which may help with a more expansive banding/QPF field? A tighter circulation would introduce potential for more in the way of banded precip? This is where my overall lack of knowledge on winter storm climo bites me in the fanny...I knows its been discussed before about differences between a more elongated low vs. tighter circulation. 

  4. 1 minute ago, ORH_wxman said:

    When I was toggling h5 at 42h, it was def a tick north. I don’t toggle QPF maps when I’m doing my analysis 

    Yeah I'm not sure why anyone would want to really do that, that analysis doesn't tell you anything at all. If you're seeing changes I would think you'd want to look at what the root cause is and look for any changes in evolution, structure, lift, etc. Sure the 18z GFS may be "south" but it was more juiced overall. That's a ton of QPF being thrown into some intense lifting. 

  5. Still pretty impressive stuff on the 18z GFS bufkit for BDL. 45 units of omega into the SGZ is pretty wild stuff. I am still a little nervous about getting widespread 12''+ (but did that anyways) given how quickly this race through. Cobb technique does have ratios under the banding around 13:1. If we can get ratios that high then 12''+ should happen

    image.thumb.png.cf1c54e8ca1bf1043859e2fd649e28ab.png

    • Like 3
  6. 2 minutes ago, Sey-Mour Snow said:

    Nicely done 

    Not as confident out towards the Cape. I always have low confidence out there since I never go into great depth looking. Spent alot of time trying to digest the banding potential and highest total swath. I almost didn't want to include that area and go with a larger range because its going to be very difficult to determine how that evolves. 

×
×
  • Create New...