Jump to content

CT Rain

Moderator Meteorologist
  • Posts

    26,072
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by CT Rain

  1. 25 minutes ago, radarman said:

    Is the rrfs available online so we can see how it does with convection?

    The 3km is hit or miss to say the least but the hrrr is borderline unusable IMO, at least around here

    The RRFS is on weatherbell for sure. It does OK from what I can see. 

    My bigger question is how it does in the cold season - cold air damming, mesoscale banding, etc. 

  2. Just now, Typhoon Tip said:

    Why would their data dissemination not match what they are saying verbally - I'm likely legit, sure but it's still interesting.  

     

    Because the METARs only report a 6 hour max every 6 hours and the 1-min obs are rounded to the nearest degree C so unless they actually dial in manually we don't know for sure. 

    If they provided 1-minute data that wasn't rounded we'd know sooner. 

    • Thanks 1
  3. 7 minutes ago, WxWatcher007 said:

    The only time I can find BDL hitting 100° in June is 6/30/64. Would be impressive if it happens next week.

    They were last at 100F in 2019. They reached 103F in 2011.

    • Like 1
  4. 12 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

    Finally getting decent rain. But won't be much.

     

    Thursday is your classic Albany to VT and NH day. Down to western MA and NW CT perhaps too. Rest of us are watching anvil canopies. 

    Yeah. Looks like a big day points N & W. 

    • Like 2
  5. 39 minutes ago, Torch Tiger said:

     

    it was loaded af lol

    you've been focusing on the dark side

     

    lol this sounding is nothing special at all. Even assuming it's overmixed in the boundary layer you've got CAPE that's not impressive with meh mid-level rates. You also have 0-6km shear on the order of 25 knots or so which is not sufficient for organization/supercells.

    Absolutely nothing like 6/20/95 or any of our more memorable events.

    620.png

    • Like 1
  6. 2 hours ago, Torch Tiger said:

    CT Rain person said no severe, laughed at that assertion days ago

    I didn't say no severe... just that sounding you posted didn't show anything of the sort. 

    • Thanks 1
    • saywhat? 1
  7. 1 hour ago, wokeupthisam said:

    Even a casual reader knows the context whenever warming is discussed, relates to AGW.  Unless I missed all the posts (wolf notwithstanding) attributing warming to non-human factors, in which case I'll stand corrected 

    99% have gotten over "why" we're warming (it's us)... and the more interesting question is what we do or don't do about it. 

    • Like 8
    • Haha 1
×
×
  • Create New...