Jump to content

OSUmetstud

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    16,433
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by OSUmetstud

  1. I thought weeklies looked okay, but the signal overall was pretty weak outside of the normal two week ensemble period.  Lots of whites on the maps, not much oranges or blues. Nothing really to be discouraged about or super excited about. 

    • Like 1
  2. 56 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

     

    I would guess because I know several people in my PSU circle of friends have subscriptions to wxbell.  I currently do not.  I can verify they are authentic though because I found some maps posted on twitter and they match up perfectly.  

    I have a wxbell subscription. I never have seen the euro seasonal on there, only the weeklies. 

  3. 1 hour ago, LoveSN+ said:

    When does the November update for the Euro come in? Should be in the next few days, yes?

    Ben Noll made some euro posts on October 5th last month. Weather.us has the monthly data on the 11th. Ukmet is also on the 11th. Nmme comes out on the 8th. 

    • Like 1
  4. I'm not sure a negative PDO here means as much as it normally would. It's a bit of a "fake" -pdo in the sense that there's really warm water in the Gulf of AK all the way south into the PAC NW. That SST arrangement along with a CP El Nino should be associated with a +PNA pattern predominantly through winter. Usually it would be cold there in a more typical -PDO. The value of the index is lowered significantly because of the warm water off japan. 

  5. Just now, Hoosier said:

    There have been cases of 3.4 warming by another 1.0C or 1.1C from the JAS value, though.  So if that happens this time, the peak would be flirting with or getting into moderate territory.

    Sure, I'm just saying there's nothing in the data set that's been this low in JAS that jumped into moderate from here. Anything can happen and I'm certainly not a Nino expert. 

  6. 3 minutes ago, raindancewx said:

    @OSUmetstud

    Part of the issue here is NOAA now bases ONI on 30-year periods that change every five years. Against a constant 1951-2010 mean for JAS (26.74C), the ONI was actually +0.39C in July-Sept. NOAA uses 26.99C for that period now. http://origin.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/ensostuff/detrend.nino34.ascii.txt

    Similar years by using a constant base for anomalies for July, Aug, Sept

    1976 27.13 26.98 27.02 0.30
    1969 27.08 27.02 27.15 0.34
    1968 27.58 27.01 26.72 0.36
    1977 27.38 26.85 27.12 0.38
    2018 27.42 26.94 27.02 0.39
    1953 27.43 26.94 27.01 0.39
    1990 27.38 27.07 26.94 0.39
    1993 27.52 26.99 27.07 0.45
    1986 27.18 27.17 27.24 0.46
    2003 27.50 27.11 26.99 0.46
    2006 27.30 27.16 27.32 0.52

    A jump well over +1.2 probably would be unprecedented v. 1951-2010 means, but the data says what it says - +0.9C is historically the low end for what the surface was in October.

    DJF 1.20 3.00 3.4 4   1.2 3 3.4 4
    1951 24.40 26.00 26.77 28.30   0.19 0.41 0.26 0.20
    1953 23.25 25.73 27.00 28.37   -0.96 0.14 0.49 0.27
    1957 24.84 26.96 28.16 29.02   0.63 1.37 1.65 0.92
    1958 23.88 25.58 26.96 28.34   -0.33 -0.01 0.45 0.24
    1963 23.75 26.10 27.36 28.33   -0.46 0.51 0.85 0.23
    1965 24.53 26.68 27.73 28.74   0.32 1.09 1.22 0.64
    1968 24.23 26.15 27.54 29.23   0.02 0.56 1.03 1.13
    1969 24.69 26.12 26.92 28.65   0.48 0.53 0.41 0.55
    1972 25.64 27.37 28.33 28.93   1.43 1.78 1.82 0.83
    1976 24.57 26.46 27.18 28.19   0.36 0.87 0.67 0.09
    1977 24.04 25.89 27.15 28.69   -0.17 0.30 0.64 0.59
    1982 27.10 28.48 28.79 28.76   2.89 2.89 2.28 0.66
    1986 25.35 26.79 27.76 28.73   1.14 1.20 1.25 0.63
    1987 24.62 26.32 27.34 28.97   0.41 0.73 0.83 0.87
    1991 25.13 27.06 28.40 29.12   0.92 1.47 1.89 1.02
    1994 25.06 26.44 27.64 29.14   0.85 0.85 1.13 1.04
    1997 27.97 28.72 28.87 28.95   3.76 3.13 2.36 0.85
    2002 24.86 26.50 27.50 29.05   0.65 0.91 0.99 0.95
    2004 24.29 26.07 27.22 29.16   0.08 0.48 0.71 1.06
    2006 24.99 26.46 27.29 29.03   0.78 0.87 0.78 0.93
    2009 24.83 26.85 28.14 29.41   0.62 1.26 1.63 1.31
    2014 24.40 26.13 27.18 29.15   0.19 0.54 0.67 1.05
    2015 26.26 28.23 29.13 29.62   2.05 2.64 2.62 1.52
    60 yr 24.21 25.59 26.51 28.10          

     

    Here is 2009 in JAS v. DJF in Nino 3.4 and Nino 1.2 (v. 1951-2010 means)

              3.4       1.2

    JAS:  +0.8     +1.0   net: warmer east by 0.2

    DJF:  +1.6     +0.6   net: colder east by 1.0

    The nature of the event clearly went from east-based to start to Modoki. There is no "slosh back" on the net. This event appears to be doing the exact opposite, since JAS was +0.0 in Nino 1.2, but is warming/about to warm. Nino 3.4 may warm too, its just, on net, the core switched from East to West, and now it is switching from West to East, even if we don't reach basin wide or obviously 1997 status, it is opposite, at least for now.

     

    El Nino exists as a relative difference to the Global and PAC SST, why shouldn't we adjust for warming oceans? 

    • Like 1
  7. 28 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

    Canadian looks colder for the northeast to me.

    Feb looks a ton better than the previous run but as a whole it the anomalies are similar. 

    I think the general look is a bit weird after December. The PAC slp and 500mb anomalies dont look particularly nino like even though the SST and convection is there. 

     

     

    cansips_z500a_namer_4.png

    cansips_z500a_namer_5.png

    cansips_T850aMean_month_namer_2.png

    cansips_T850aMean_month_namer_3.png

  8. 4 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

    This should be a pretty good Nino for us. It is west based (some might argue central...but this is a purely semantical argument since it is NOT east based whatsoever) and it is pretty weak to boot.

     

    This historically has been our bread and butter. If there is an ENSO state to get more aggressive and go gangbusters on the snow for SNE, this is it.

    Right it's not as central/west as 09/10 but it's definitely more centered in 3.4/4 as opposed to 3/1.2. It's technically not a modoki because Nino 1.2 isn't below normal I think? 

  9. I noted that the CP Nino events had more AK/Western Canada ridging as the north PAC low is further west. This would help out the northeast for storm threats, I believe. The "fake" -NAO in EP Nino with Canada baking from PAC flow doesn't really help things. 

    • Like 3
×
×
  • Create New...