Jump to content

Tatamy

Members
  • Posts

    2,329
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Tatamy

  1. 33 minutes ago, bluewave said:

    With a little luck the stronger Rockies Ridge, Southeast Ridge, and sharper trough on the Euro and Canadian verifies so this can get pulled in closer to the coast by the bowling ball upper low.


    IMG_3051.thumb.png.25010bd6ae74b1d94587695140778434.png
     

    IMG_3048.thumb.png.43bad4c8ce71b7283eb06b138733a74f.png

    IMG_3053.thumb.png.6ffeac1062e78f47be2541517dcafc36.png

     

     

    This is one of these be careful for what you wish for types of storms.  As shown on the 0z run of the Euro the storm is very intense and would cause major disruption across the area.  Strong winds, high tides with coastal flooding and erosion,  heavy snows with travel impacts, and a sting jet on the backside would all combine to cause major problems across the area.  The 06z run tracked the center further east away from the coast.

  2. 1 hour ago, MJO812 said:

    I got 3 inches yesterday.  Who was screwed ?  I have screenshots of you stating that NYC was only going to get 2 inches for the rest of the month but I'm not going to post those.  Stop making blank statements.

    I got a half inch of slop yesterday.  No worries because I knew it wasn’t going to produce out here.  We all know that we’re not going to get snow from every system that comes.  I am very happy that you folks in the city and on the island did well with it.  In any case this week looks quite good.

    • Like 1
    • clap 1
  3. Freezing drizzle here with 28F.  Kudos to the RGEM / Euro for predicting the snow burst that set up over the Metro area.  For me the NAM gets the win with no snow and sleet and freezing rain only.  I got about 0.25” of sleet and ice.  I actually just woke up to the sound of the salt truck in my neighborhood.  Many of the models were predicting a tight gradient between snow and no snow over western NJ and that turned out to be the case.

    • Like 2
  4. 3 minutes ago, RU848789 said:

    Agreed.  The current radar is quite close to what the fairly snowy 21Z HRRR was showing at 6 pm, whereas the 18Z NAM at 7 pm looked weak and spotty.  Doesn't mean the HRRR will be right and the NAM wrong, but that's the case so far, IMO.

    ref1km_ptype.us_ma.png

    ref1km_ptype.us_ma.png

    image.thumb.png.df81e07ba89d1f7e48fac3f767542997.png

    Not sure where you got that radar view on the bottom from but it’s not correct.

    • Like 1
  5. 6 minutes ago, Allsnow said:

    I think this looks pretty identical to the radar currently in Pa. Everything looks aimed towards the metro but what ptype is up to debate. I do like how strong and solid the returns looks currently 

    IMG_4824.png

    As of 6 PM you have to be north of I80 if you want to find snow in PA.  The only exception is Fort Indiantown Gap which is reporting flurries.  Everyone else is reporting ice / sleet/ wintry mix or rain.  All Pittsburgh reporting sites are reporting thunderstorms.  

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...