ChescoWx

Scary for sure....but like all these longer term forecasts to date...highly unlikely to come close to reality!!

Ah so because one does not believe it is a significant threat (which most do not) if you fail on the 2nd part of that little test you are a Climate Denier. If that is true than are you as the dictionary says meeting the definition of a "climate alarmist" which is " a person who exaggerates the dangers of climate change and its potential impacts, often by using sensationalized language or promoting policies based on these exaggerated fears. ???

Again Don there is of course no such thing as a climate change denial movement - climate of course always changes correct?? That term is an example of what fake news is! Now the magnitude of any impact that man may have had on the many varied climate cycles the earth has gone through is certainly on the table... and some day it's true scientific impact may be quantified. But please keep in mind that I am not the one that chooses to use such dark language....by using the words you choose above you are indeed fear mongering. I know you really believe what you post but I really believe it does more harm than good to paint such a dark future without adequate science and proven models to support such miserable predictions.

Hi Hazwoper....you may not be clear on what data I use It is only for Chester County PA. It is a combo of NWS COOP Trained Spotter /AWOS /DEOS , USCR and GOES data sourced data points. If in doubt take a look at my website which lists and links to all of the data points at www.chescowx.com I draw no conclusions but do assume there exists no known climate fence around the perimeters of beautiful Chester County PA LOL!!

Notice the facts below how even that station that Charlie terms "consistent data" at Phoenixville was in reality missing around 20 years of data. from 1895 through 1914. Also take a look how those big 3 stations were all deeply discounted and adjusted downward. This includes both those stations that Charlie thinks are somehow "heat islands" and those that are not....what again is the control arm used for these changes? How can the revised temperature not have any actual control station in the county that supports or aligns with the coolest station in the county? Instead NOAA adjusts to a figure so much lower with these post hoc altered adjustments to arrive at a revised temperature that is in fact not rooted at all to any factual temperatures of any stations at all in the entire county of Chester? Keep in mind in 29 of these 30 years they inserted a temperature lower than ANY ACTUAL STATION in the entire county.....where is the control data for the County??? It cannot be in some other county it just cannot!!

The above is a dystopian view not rooted in actual science, reality or facts....you point to faulty future state models to support your fears. Do you ever read what you post? The following words are why those that believe in some scary climate religion are now quickly losing followers. The fear mongering is pervasive in the above words and thoughts chosen by Don. He chooses words such as "crumbling coast" , "families watched helplessly", "erosion devoured", "tides insatiable pull", "ocean reclaimed", "destruction will spread", "societal sickness", "infection", "rejection of science", "sustainability breaks down", "deepening societal sickness", "narrowing window". Don where is this "tragedy of climate change"? All of those words and fear mongering you threw at us above only hurts the science you attempt to defend. This kind of narrative and post is exactly why folks are moving away from any belief that climate change is anything other than a typical cyclical occurrence. If we keep crying wolf like Al Gore about melting ice caps, increasing number of hurricanes, intensity and coastline obliteration followed by the verifiable facts failing to support these predictions this doubt about our future climate state will only deepen and spread....you can count on that!

Hi rcostell just an FYI a troll is someone who posts offensive, provocative or disruptive content that upset others under the cover of anonymity. I am not anonymous I appropriately reference all data. I have a weather website with clear links to all data. It is real and it is not fake. A poster cannot be a troll for simply posting actual real NWS data. Why would you or anyone be "offended" by the audacity of posting the raw climate data that you disagree with?? It is science being debated with facts - that is of course not trolling at all!

LOL! showing photos that are not from 1945 or 1948 certainly support these altered temperature adjustments. And you are good at ignoring the factual actual data that does not support your world view of climate. You never answer where is the control data for the county? Answer not in Chester County PA at all! The fact is NOAA chose to adjust the temperature to levels below any other reporting site in the county on a consistent basis almost every year before and after the move for decades in a row. That is the epitome of fake data. We only traffic in actual data not fantasy!!

Below normal temperatures should continue for much of the next week with the exception of Sunday which could see some valley locations touch the low 70's. Our next rain chances look to increase by later Sunday with the next cold front. We turn below normal again to start next week.

Below normal temperatures should continue for much of the next week with the exception of Sunday which could see some valley locations touch the low 70's. Our next rain chances look to increase by later Sunday with the next cold front. We turn below normal again to start next week.

LOL! and you have never shown a single station that is warranted!! Sorry Charlie as you well know those are NOAA's adjustments of course not mine as I only show the actual real raw data prior to those post hoc adjustments they chose to make decades later. There is zero proof or supporting data you ever show that any station moves made any difference at all let alone adjustments of up to 3 or more degrees....

We should do all we can to protect our planet....but we should not encourage delusions and altered realities that somehow man is going to change the future cyclical climate we have always experienced since the dawn of time. We should not encourage or feed such fantasies!

Now how about we show the real pattern of the NOAA adjustments....wonder why we chill the past and warm the present???

What's your question? Is the next cooling cycle beginning??? We don't have complete data for this year or decade yet so let's see!!

As always zero support for the post hoc cooling adjustments for 89 straight years....and now overall warming adjustment to recent years.