Ginx snewx

November thread? Glad you got it, was my target zone you and Pete MRG

Oh man have to behave don't want to give Baby Scoots a bad impression

I have no idea on that Algo but it melts snow as it falls if surface temp is above 32 even if the actual surfaces are well below feezing

We tracked them last 2 winters. Worse than clowns.

Wait baby Scooter?. Oh man now I have to behave , fuck

Those piece of shit (POS)positive snow depths are more worthless than clowns

Man how did you know. Euro agrees with you.

GFS ?? I will be shocked if the GFS wins anything. I hope you have been paying attention all fall. Its been amped with every system but we shall see if its really leading the way or just a figment of someone's imagination

I am hoping for heavy rates to wash out minor 850 925 plus .2s

Jerry is in Chicago

I get it totally. Just trying to pull out of you why you tossed the 6z Euro and Ens in favor of the GFS

Moisture from bodies of water or existing precipitation is essential to raise the dew point temperature and saturate the boundary layer. Convective Available Potential Energy (CAPE): Snow squalls are convective events, and CAPE is a significant discriminator between squalls and other snow events. Higher CAPE values indicate a greater potential for deep vertical growth. Time of occurrence: Because they are convective, snow squalls most often happen during daylight hours, with 69% of events occurring between 1300 and 2300 UTC. Radar parameters Reflectivity: Snow squalls typically show reflectivity values greater than 30 dBZ. Radial velocity: Maximum radial velocities in excess of 30 knots are another indicator. Atmospheric parameters Isallobaric effects: Strong surface isallobaric (pressure rise/fall) couplets, combined with steep near-surface lapse rates, contribute to the conditions that produce a squall. 0–2 km layer: The stability of the 0–2 km AGL layer is a factor in snow squall development.

I love you man. No fighting just my opinion. I hope Euro Ens nail this.

Oh and he will tell me its the bong. Windsexy day for many AWT

The only way you know to post. Sad that you put yourself on such a popely standing with your meh track record

Absolutely nothing set in stone other than the Debbie's minds

That's not an opinion that is interpretation

Too far sw

You know skewts use closest data points not exact location right

Tough when we change our opinions every 6 hours ha

Please show us why you say the vertical resolution on skewts published by professional forecasters is wrong. You can't just say that without proof.

Very active month. Some hits Some not. All we can ask for is the chances. Temps are there hopefully the tracks are good. Peeps should know their climo. Anything more than 4 inches here the next 15 days is a bonus

See show us the deets. Back your statement up is all ask not some weak sardonic Masshole remark

Wut? I see isothermic dump showme your better vertical resolution 6 z Euro. Deets!!!

Not for my soundings unless the .2 at 1000 mb counts. Total paste job. Hopefully 6z Euro is correct. Humpy my name is Thumpy. Wash those minor levels out with 3 per hour stuff