Jump to content

Syrmax

Members
  • Posts

    5,654
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Syrmax

  1. 1 minute ago, Blue Moon said:

    Oswego storm total just under 7 inches so far. Could still have several more inches ahead!

    Curious is conditions will become more favorable for dendritic growth as this event progresses. Right now we have a nose that's warmer than the desirable -10 to -20 C window. We're almost at -10 C at the sfc right now but you don't hit that temperature again until you go up to the 600mb level. Once we get near that mark for the 850-600 mb level we'll hopefully get some bigger flakes that will give us a boost!

    HRRR looks favorable for snow continuing almost all day tomorrow in Oswego. It may be lighter but we could have bigger flakes.

    Another thing- our RH at the SFC is below 90%. Cold, dry air is really trying to fight its way forward.

    Could you post a close up of a random model Kuchie for Rochester area? Asking for a friend...

    • Haha 2
  2. 6 minutes ago, TugHillMatt said:

    Yeah, I was trying to find how much the snowpack melted from perusing the New England and New York City subforums.

    48 degree dewpoints down there. Yikes.

    I just looked thru CoCoRAHS reports this a.m., generally a few inches more than us where the storm hit in SNE but less than Erie Cty out near Buffalo. And I went from 8" to 5.5" depth in past couple of days.  A lot of them will be clean sheet by tomorrow.

  3. Just now, TugHillMatt said:

    I was hoping that for once those models would be wrong and we could get REAL snow in a synoptic system here. You've lived here longer, so you know the climo better. As I've asked so many times, how on earth do we actually get to the average of 130 inches?? lol... Seems like so much always goes wrong. But like I mentioned a couple of times, these SWFEs are not ideal for Syracuse with the influences of topography to our south and northeast. We live and die by way of the coastals of yesteryear.

    Still lots left in this system though...and perhaps the lake can get more involved than current thoughts. That enhancement has saved us a couple times since I've lived here. We get those hours of pure fluff.

    We had a normal Nov for snowfall (at KSYZ), about 9". Jan was a little light but 80-90% of Norm.  BUT, WE LOST DECEMBER.  If Feb and March are avg, we'll end up around 100" or so. Then there is the April and May "bone-us" snows. ;)

    • Haha 1
  4. 6 minutes ago, tombo82685 said:

    yea, gotta be lack of omega which lays that out well with lack of qpf. Didn't most models have like 1.2-1.4 for cuse area qpf wise lol?

    Yes, that's what most models were Spitting out for KSYZ for qpf.  One caveat, we are a bit N of KSYZ and the soundings I was looking at were for the airport. If heaviest qpf is from SYZ to say Cortland, just to my south,  wouldn't shock me to see the city end up a bit better than here.  OTOH, we're halfway to double digits and a long way to go yet...so we may end up ok given the ratios I just measured...

    • Like 1
  5. 22 minutes ago, TugHillMatt said:

    Syrmax stands solid on snowfall statements. Sleet-sized snowflakes falling in the synoptic snowstorm suckhole Sizzlecuse.

    This was foreseen by some of the model soundings i was looking at the past day or so. But i was seeing some decent periods tonight. So maybe we get some better production at some point. This is long duration so maybe 10-12" not out of the question for us.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...