Jump to content

burrel2

Members
  • Posts

    2,388
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by burrel2

  1. it appears the energy configuration as it crosses the rocky mountains is a complete crapshoot. None of the models agree with one another in that regard.  I think we need the energy to come out in such a way that it involves a middle piece phasing in with a northern piece and deepening/closing off as it drops southeast from Missouri to South Carolina. That's the only way the core of the upper low/trough will be cold enough to support snow.  We also need to energy to zip on through the great plains and get here quick to capitalize on the decent boundary layer temps we have from the residual high pressure left behind from that front that moves through tomorrow. (ideally we need the meat of the precip to arrive late friday night/early saturday morning).  

    What we don't want is a coherent southern piece of energy to come out and phase in with a middle piece that leads the wave sharpening in to a strong closed low towards the gulf states/florida with not nearly enough cold air to produce anything but rain.  Also it appears the models focusing in on the southern piece are slower in general with the track of the trough/low and thus allow temps to warm even more. The ukmet is the slowest of all b/c it just has the southern piece diving south/occluding  and spinning around over  Southern Texas Sunday morning... (seems to be the extreme outlier at the moment).

    FWIW, honestly the best "agreement" right now is between the cmc/gfs/icon as they all have somewhat similar evolution of the various pieces.  Euro/jma are similar to each with a slower/further south cut off low.  The Ukmet is all alone with the due south moving, then stationary closed low over texas.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  2. Euro and GFS don't look that far apart to me.  They're both really far south with a bombing upper level low.  If we can keep that feature but trend it more to the north and deeper it could get interesting. IMO, the likelihood of it occluding that far south is doubtful.  More likely it either follows an evolution like the CMC, or closes off further north bringing NC/VA in to the game for heavy snow.

    • Like 2
  3. 1 minute ago, PackGrad05 said:

    I haven't had a chance to look at a lot of the details.  What's the issue for Raleigh?  Cold air or storm track too close to coast?  or both?

    Biggest issue there might be time of day.  Hard to get snow to the ground at this lattitude in early April at 1pm. Also, the cold air aloft has had more time to modify by then as well.  The best timing for snow appears to be set up in upstate SC.  Definitely worth watching for Charlotte and points north and east though.

  4. I've got a feeling this storm is going to surprise someone. Setup is absolutely perfect.  Thermals look great for upstate SC. Just need the blossoming precip shield to be a tick farther north than some models show.  As it stands now, it looks like Mack's house over towards Charlotte could jackpot with 3 or 4 hours of moderate to heavy snow tomorrow morning. I wouldn't be surprised if a band in this area picks up a quick 3 or 4 inches, imo.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...