sorta yes n no. If you look at thermal progression, models have different depth of cold, so we need to look at winds to "scour" the valleys out. Verbatim IF cold holds (which if the gfs verifies (but is often a couple degrees too cold) we'd likely see the ice make it through as there is a brief window of warmth before the cold raced back in. If cold is shallow, ice accretion may be lost before said cold hardens up whatever we have otg.
Here is my point
we've lost 850's so one says....oh no big deal...what ice you talkin bout Willis?. This is "warmest" panel.
Buutttttttt....Willis forgot to look at 2m temps at same timestamp.
Verbatim thats deep enough surface temps to warrant concern.
Sounding show how "deep the cold is...or isnt. As you can see the layer is very shallow (picked Lanco for soundings). Look at bottom of graph and chalk a line from the 0 straight up. We dont have much cold, but for this situ...its all about the surface and how long it takes to erradicate that little cold layer. Hope that helps a bit.