Jump to content

winter_warlock

Members
  • Posts

    1,105
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by winter_warlock

  1. 14 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

    It is risky but it can work. I’m shocked how similar the setup is to Jan 22 1987 given its nearly the same time of year and that was one of my top analogs!  
    IMG_0901.thumb.gif.8a923b16ae417ca5d058b5774f6ec2bc.gif

    There was no high in front of that one.  It had a little wave rotate around ahead of the anchor vortex but the key was that the trough remained positive tilted until the partial phase with the stj in the southeast. That way once the storm starts to get pulled north it won’t track inside where we need it.  But it’s a very similar progression to what the gfs just did.
     

    This would be like a best possible case outcome for this type of setup of course but this can work if the wave stays positive until it’s east of the Mississippi.  There was a storm in 1966 that was somewhat similar with a due north track also.  Also one of my top analogs!

    IMG_0900.jpeg.75f32b554081f7d3c6deb18243cf382b.jpeg 

     

    Oh man i remember those back to back storms in 87.  Had 6 foot drifts going up  my moms back deck lol

  2. 38 minutes ago, baltosquid said:

    Also for the 20th, precip on GEFS indicates the GoM is going to spin something up.

    gfs-ens_apcpn24_atl_fh204-240.thumb.gif.96b31071dd00282b97b8e53fa293ea38.gif
    Obviously as depicted it's OTS but given the beautiful bigger picture, hard to complain at this range... good to know there's potentially energy around, then got to get it in our neighborhood.

       I think its in a decent spot for 230 hours out :)

×
×
  • Create New...