Jump to content

psuhoffman

Members
  • Posts

    26,990
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by psuhoffman

  1. There were several times where one or two model runs showed a snowstorm day 8-10. But if you just count the Gfs/euro/ggem there are 8 op runs a day. If 1-2 show a snowstorm that actually means most guidance didn’t and taken as a whole was saying it wouldn’t snow. Never not once was the majority of guidance over a 24-48 hour period showing a snowstorm.
  2. Because our snow is bounded by 0 and we’re pretty close to the southern edge of where it snows in a grand sense even in a good winter. There are plenty of places further north where guidance underestimates snow at times on the whole. But some is perception bias. We remember the runs that snow and forget the many many many that don’t. Take right now…the vast majority is showing no snow. But the minority that shows snow is giving the perception “guidance is predicting snow” but at no time has our probability of snow across guidance reached 50% all winter. When taken in totality guidance hasn’t once predicted snow here all winter.
  3. Most definitely. A point of reference I’ve noticed…keep the h5 south of Chicago and we have a shot. It will turn southeast because of the block but it can’t get too far north before that happens. Or else we need it to be so suppressive it would kill it. There is no possible win that way. Keep the h5 track south of Chicago and we have a path. NAM is south.
  4. How did I miss that...it gives me like 2 feet. Oh cause its the JMA I will say this its been rock steady with that solution...if it wins this beats 2006 as its best coup ever.
  5. UK was close to huge…big hit northern parts of our region.
  6. Dayum another wave day 10 but suppressed by the bomb still sitting over New England from wave 2 which ends up dropping 40” up there lol. And another wave lined up behind that one. Crazy crazy run.
  7. Storm 1 Storm 2 you will all be relieved to know it gets its act together in time to crush Boston!
  8. So euro split the energy and managed to almost snow twice. But both were soooo close to a bigger result. A tip of the scales towards either could go it! Or if that second wave is more in sync it could have pulled it off. It was super close.
  9. It’s the same wave it’s just coming across in two pieces unlike prior runs and most guidance that has it consolidated. If that wave were to have been consolidated thus run it might have been BIG
  10. My high res is too. Pivotal has the low res out to 120 and 144. Euro might be in that magic spot where we can get some snow from both waves. At 144 wave 1 is exiting and looks like enough space for wave 2
  11. It’s not a huge deal. Storm is starting to amplify but probably not in time to get us with the secondary. But we got a nice little thump snow DC north from the inverted trough passage.
  12. H5 tracks to Chicago then SE through OH and right over DC. I’d love to get that another 100 miles south but this is much better. Again the key is keeping that h5 south initially.
  13. Surface temps aren’t out yet. I’m sure they are a problem. But this is a huge improvement in every way!
  14. It’s all improved so far. Meant to say “bit more confluence” not “but”
  15. Hr 78 euro slightly improved. H5 seems slightly south. But less ridging. Bit more confluence to our northeast.
  16. I guess if we want to be optimists there could be an ever so slim zone where it’s possible to get a hit from both. I think that would require wave 2 to slow down which was a trend on the Gfs. We would need more separation between the waves to pull off a double because wave 1 will need to be pretty darn amped and tucked for us to get any snow.
×
×
  • Create New...