Jump to content

TimB

Members
  • Posts

    17,049
  • Joined

Everything posted by TimB

  1. Biggest event, yes. PIT ended up at 9.7”. NWS posted this map. Looks like most of the county got 7-8 or so.
  2. Yesterday’s storm brings us to 39.6” officially for the season, which is exactly where we should be through 3/12. Looks like I got my single digit low at PIT, latest since 1993.
  3. I thought the MLK “bust” discussion would end if we got another good storm but sadly that doesn’t appear to be the case.
  4. Plus I think it’s been discussed here before that they try to keep their message to the general public consistent. Conspiracy theorists like me think there’s some sort of bureaucratic quality control where forecasters get dinged if they have to constantly downgrade and upgrade warnings/advisories, but that may be a stretch.
  5. Because 4.3” of that fell between midnight and 2am and I presume they felt it was too late to upgrade to a warning at that point.
  6. Perfect, really. The snow came in early enough and hung on long enough that even those of us who slept got to enjoy seeing it fall on both ends of the storm.
  7. Awesome finish to winter. Overperformed massively and left no doubt as to its status as a warning level snow. Best March storm in recent memory and I’d probably even rank it ahead of 2018 even if the total won’t be as high.
  8. Already a coating here. Temp at PIT reached 32 at 10:10. Ahead of schedule.
  9. The only thing I can think of that would make the airport significantly higher than the city’s totals in this case is UHI. There is a lot of sun today and a transition from very warm to cold, with the bulk of the snow falling early in that transition period.
  10. 18z long range HRRR that shows the whole storm I would guess should look better than 12z. The last few hourly runs have trended up through hour 18. Edit: it’s keeping hope alive for a high end advisory event.
  11. Sure enough, just like the 12z model suite, NWS has made a slight adjustment for the better:
  12. Both NAMs were very underwhelming. No real winners except far eastern PA.
  13. How? I thought there was a Ross snow hole in the MLK storm.
  14. HRRR puts down a solid 5”, with some areas of the county exceeding 6” in places that see the lake enhanced bands in NW flow (which the NWS admits may be overdone).
  15. Meh. Next week looked warm even when we were hoping for a bigger storm, so even that wouldn’t have hung around long.
  16. So let’s say it’s 4”. Will it survive the sun angle of a mostly cloudy mid-March day with temperatures in the low 20s, or will it be gone before sunset?
  17. Not convinced we’re getting 4 either but it is what it is. On to thunderstorm season, then months of it being 88 and miserably humid while Syracuse gets to 95.
  18. GFS continues to look pretty good. Most everything else continues to look pretty meh. Something has to give.
  19. I think his comments make sense. If we get 2-4” we finish the winter with a total in the 30s, while if we get nothing we can still finish the winter with a total in the 20s which gives him more of an avenue to complain about how horrible this winter was.
  20. So basically the maps that were issued at 1:50 pm are based on 0z model runs?
  21. It’s not the watch that is perplexing. It’s more the fact that the forecast snow map actually increased from 5.3” to 6.4” in Pittsburgh despite the fact that the models seem to have gone the other way in the time between the issuances of those two maps.
  22. Maybe they’re including yesterday’s total in the 5-7?
  23. 5-7”? This is looking more and more like just a frontal passage for us.
  24. Hopefully it’s just the NAM being stupid but we’ve heard this song before and we know how it ends.
×
×
  • Create New...