Jump to content

WinterWxLuvr

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    29,279

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by WinterWxLuvr

  1. WinterWxLuvr
    You forgot “cram that ruler so far into the ground that you turn one earthworm into two”
  2. WinterWxLuvr
    Do as @WxUSAFsays but be sure to use a ruler measured in tenths (which I’ve never seen one in all of my life) and maybe even hundredths so you can report your highly detailed, highly accurate totals, with no photo, as most do. Here’s an example: I got 1.79” from this storm!! J/K
  3. WinterWxLuvr
    I honestly have no faith in this model. When it shows good things I disregard that also.
  4. WinterWxLuvr
    True. What it shows is deeper low. And deepening. The main issue for us as I see it is to get that thing to begin that development about 3-6 hours earlier. I think that’s doable.
  5. WinterWxLuvr
    That’s the model he had posted about
  6. WinterWxLuvr
    After yesterday I have renounced my Viking fan status for at least a day or two lol
  7. WinterWxLuvr
    Lol, skill
  8. WinterWxLuvr
    A general wetter/drier is all we should be looking at. Pinpointing the exact highest amounts is not a SKOL that the models have.
  9. WinterWxLuvr
    I agree. If this tries to develop east of the mountains it wil leave us high and dry out here
  10. WinterWxLuvr
    Wasn’t this the model that put out 50” for Baltimore last January about 36 hours before the event?
  11. WinterWxLuvr
    At least early, the trend seems wetter. Small steps
  12. WinterWxLuvr
    So true
  13. WinterWxLuvr
    In all seriousness, I don’t find the 3k to be very reliable.
  14. WinterWxLuvr
    I’ll tell ya, I don’t think it would take much to make this at least interesting. Seriously
  15. WinterWxLuvr
    Big improvement in the NAM. This should be starting to get close to the start of the beginning of where the NAM might start to begin to get at least a little better idea of what might happen.
  16. WinterWxLuvr
    Looks like the SREFS dried up to me
  17. WinterWxLuvr
    I do really think that this is a fine line situation. If you go back and look at the upper levels from the runs that were good vs the weaker runs now, you can’t find real significant differences, only minor ones.
  18. WinterWxLuvr
    This one is tricky I think and could surprise. Might not too. So, that’s my contribution.
  19. WinterWxLuvr
    I’ll argue this with anyone … that’s dumb as hell
  20. WinterWxLuvr
    People don’t believe in superstition? How about results? Seems to happen every time with any marginal event.
  21. WinterWxLuvr
    I think this is purely a timing issue. I expect a lot of back and forth with this. We shall see
  22. WinterWxLuvr
    The line between decent and next to nothing on this system seems very thin. It wouldn’t be surprising to see this become a surprise as we get closer
  23. WinterWxLuvr
    Welp …
  24. WinterWxLuvr
    I agree. Meager precip for mean means upwards of a quarter of an inch. We get that Wednesday and I’ll be thrilled. It’s those 0.05 deals that grind my gears.
  25. WinterWxLuvr
    New grass?
×
×
  • Create New...