Jump to content

ORH_wxman

Moderator Meteorologist
  • Posts

    93,092
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ORH_wxman

  1. Only potential "negative" is the southern stream is a tick slower....so that could cause it to make up ground a bit later...but the heights are definitely noticeably lower over NE, so I think that hopefully ends up causing a less amped solution.
  2. GFS looks a bit more suppressed than 06z on the heights out ahead of it at 48 hours.
  3. NY State...even if this ticks east some it will be in NY State probably....since the western solutions are in SE Ontario to near MSS....lol.
  4. It's the NAM, but I'm only looking at 54 hours (not 84) and the northern stream shortwave is a lot weaker this run and the Friday system is hanging back quite a bit while the southern stream is digging a bit more south....I think this would create a better slingshot solution for NE.
  5. Yeah prob more like 8-12 then a slot. But if we can nudge this east enough to get the low over the Cape, then we could see some amounts marginally over 12"....kind of like March 2017...I think I had 13-14" in that one before getting slotted. On the flip side, we can prob sell amounts over 8" if something closer to the Euro happens.
  6. Yeah the midlevels actually look decent and not a total Bruce Willis job. I think that would actually argue for more precip west....but I'd want to see some other guidance nudge like the NAM before getting too invested.
  7. If we can get that band back to here, we'd prob pick up a couple inches. It's just about here on the 12z NAM.
  8. GFS was def better at 06z. Need to see the euro come back east some.
  9. I just got up to look, but EPS looked west. Like way west. Not a single member is southeast of us now
  10. Rgem doesn’t go out far enough but the Friday storm hangs back this run and the southern shortwave sped up vs 18z. So that combo would def make it eastward. We’ll see if those are real trends or just false flags by the JV team.
  11. Icon will be east of 18z. Still waiting for the useful models to come out.
  12. Yeah I’d agree with that. The spread looks like it’s larger on the 18z run.
  13. 18z EPS actually looks a bit west of the 12z run. I’m on my phone so can’t really toggle but eyeball glance looks west
  14. It had the same trend as the 18z GFS with lower heights out ahead of it over New England. I think that would help the front end even if it tries to track west.
  15. I don’t know if it’s more likely…it’s close enough for me not to be the arbiter of which one stays and which one goes. There’s definitely a western limit to this and BUF may be near that limit. There’s more room on the eastern side than on the western side…the skew won’t be a normal/Gaussian distribution.
  16. We’d have to throw out the ones over BUF too if we did that.
  17. It’s not super far from being a 12/16/07 type coastal. If you recall, that was originally supposed to track into BUF but the high got better and eventually we got a triple point over SE MA…and of course the big snow thump.
  18. One reason to remain somewhat optimistic for more snow is that the antecedent airmass is strong, so if that high holds on just a shade longer, you prob get disproportional return on the snowfall in the positive direction. You can even see it on the some of the ensemble members. Some of the ones that hold onto the high just a smidge more thump 8-12" in a pretty large area over SNE.
  19. I love how the 3km NAM tracks the storm almost right over the BM but it doesn't get precip much past PYM.
  20. Trough is a little broader than 12z though....so it prob won't tuck that precip shield back as far west.
×
×
  • Create New...