Jump to content

whoosh

Members
  • Posts

    43
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by whoosh

  1. Reviewing SREF plumes and GEFS member plumes and spreads this morning, there is still quite a spread of 850 data, 2mT and QPF contributing to the derived uncertainties.
  2. Merits repeating, seemingly endlessly. Thanks, Ricky.
  3. Polar context: which will surely bring down more frigid air
  4. Doesn't look very typical to me (morning of 28th), at any level.
  5. OK, we already know it's going to be cold. So here's another 4panel, just in case it helps ;-}
  6. It appears that Gulf moisture and 850 temp convergence is not getting far enough North.
  7. and worse than that, they refer to individual op runs as as some kind of good/bad/whatever solely from the perspective of their desires. That's not science. Some folks even use the totally uninformative qualifier "sick". Oh well.
  8. No. The one "Expected" graphic is manually generated. All the others are not; only using multiple model outputs.
  9. However, the 50% probability tops out at 7" unless I'm understanding badly. https://www.weather.gov/lot/winter
  10. In other words, it quantifies the magnitude of uncertainty for small differences of initial conditions/assumptions.
  11. I look here ... <http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/gc_wmb/tdorian/gefs/EMCGEFSplumes.html> before I look at GFS snow panels.
×
×
  • Create New...