Jump to content

Malacka11

Members
  • Posts

    2,079
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Malacka11

  1. 9 minutes ago, Stevo6899 said:

    Well that's troubling for sure. Not sure why someone with any kind of intelligence that Hoosier seems to have would be stupid and think that would fly.

    And what's really wild is that he then proceeded to do the same type of shit a couple more times over the next few years. The last time I knew of he got banned for a little bit and his moderator access was removed so I can't imagine that he would do something that dumb again.

    • Thanks 1
  2. 1 minute ago, Stevo6899 said:

    Tbh it's none of our business and nobody's business on here. Never trust what you hear from anyone, especially on the internet. Just clique bullying prob going on. If something legit happened, then that's the police job.

    My guy he literally made a post in OT about whether anybody else finds 16-year-olds attractive a couple years back. If that's not our business then I couldn't possibly tell you what the fuck is.

    • Thanks 1
  3. Just now, Powerball said:

    Call it what you want.

    But the current output would be a once in a 50-year event (and that's being generous, I mean how often do we see a widespred 12"+ blizzard along the STL-IND-DTW corridor?) And that's not accounting for the typical shenanigans the models have been pulling with over-amping these storms in the medium range.

    That said, it will probably end up being a decent run-of-the-mill storm (6-10" with some blowing/drifitng) for parts of the subforum when all said and done. And given the winter you've all had, it could be far worse.

    I'm not saying that there's gonna be a mega dog or something, I'm just that even if I know that virtually every storm pulls the same shit, I let myself get a little hyped. Imagine if like GHD1 happens again in a few years and the whole lead-up to it I refuse to buy in and get excited only for it to actually happen. I'd kick myself in the nuts. Acting like a giddy child because it just might snow a lot is the whole name of my game regardless of the chances.

    • Like 5
  4. 1 hour ago, OrdIowPitMsp said:

    I disagree, while it sucks seeing 12-15”  instead of 18-22” I want us to crack the top 10 for longest continuous snowcover of 1” or more. #10 is 107 days and we are at 84 days today. Plus still have a shot at the all time seasonal snowfall record. If I was chasing futility maybe I’d have a different outlook.

    Well yeah, I mean in your position I'd definitely take anything. Shit, in my position too I suppose. But in terms of stickiness..

     

  5. 8 minutes ago, hawkeye_wx said:

    I've never expected more than light to moderate rain here, perhaps including a bit of freezing rain.  I'm fine with that.  We got our good storm last week.  I hate seeing the Euro and UK drastically cutting snow totals up in Minnesota/Wisconsin, though... 30+% across the board compared to a few runs ago.

    I'd genuinely rather miss out altogether than have a mega dog trend to a big dog. To be that excited for something labeled as potentially historic for days only for it to trend downwards would be far worse than just another miss in an already shit winter. Here's to hoping that things shift back. 

  6. I'm pretty sure we've had at least a couple events this year that started off with great model consensus over the high plains and ended up fucking off east of here. Not trying to hype up or anything, just saying that what might look like remarkable model agreement now could vanish entirely in two hours

  7. 3 minutes ago, michsnowfreak said:

    Chicago has already passed their futility record though

    Touche but honestly I've been enjoying the near fifty and sunny we've had the last few days. I guess if it's a solid thumping I'd take it but 

    • Like 1
  8. 3 minutes ago, ILSNOW said:

    Went there and it was posted.

    Oof, that's odd. I've been sitting here refreshing it every few minutes and it didn't show up until like ten minutes after you posted it. That makes sense though, not the first time that something like this seems to have happened 

  9. 1 minute ago, Hoosier said:

    I'm not sure there is a feasible way for this to be a 6+ storm in the area.  The trough is so positive tilt, which can produce a good snow sometimes, but this is also pretty progressive overall.

    If the snow could at least stick around until maybe another chance next week, then I'd be more enthusiastic but that's not gonna happen so...

  10. 13 minutes ago, ILSNOW said:

    from our friends at NWS

    Farther to the northwest, a southwest to northeastward oriented
    baroclinic zone is expected to set up over far northwestern IL and
    adjacent areas of southern WI and eastern IA Wednesday into
    Wednesday night following the departure of the potent storm system
    tracking across the Upper Midwest Tuesday night. This baroclinic
    zone is likely to foster a band of moderate to possibly heavy band
    of accumulating snow late Wednesday night into Thursday as
    strengthening mid-level deformation along the systems
    northwestern periphery induces a rather healthy band of
    frontogenesis beneath the entrance region of an upper jet.
    Questions still remain on which exact areas this band of
    accumulating snow will occur, but current indications would
    support this roughly along and southwest to northeastern corridor
    from northern MO and southern and eastern IA through far northern
    parts of IL (north of I-88) into WI. There is also a threat of a
    light wintry mix of freezing rain and sleet just south of the
    heavier band of snow, and this wintry mix could fall across parts
    of the I-80 and I-88 corridors (including parts of the Chicago
    metro area) Thursday morning. Overall, this system does not look
    to be a major snow or ice maker for the area, but with the
    potential for a few inches of snow to fall

    Where'd you get this from before they actually posted it?

×
×
  • Create New...